Solving the Mystery of Racing Cans of Broth Down a Ramp

AI Thread Summary
In a discussion about racing two cans of broth down a ramp, one frozen and one liquid, initial calculations suggested the frozen can would win due to its higher velocity from lower density. However, the liquid can surprisingly outperformed the frozen can in practice. Factors influencing this outcome included potential increased friction on the frozen can's rough surface and the liquid's ability to act as a lubricant, reducing friction. Additionally, the liquid may have had a higher initial velocity, contributing to its faster performance. The conversation also touched on the definition of translational kinetic energy, emphasizing its role in the motion of the cans.
puravida
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
hey everybody, I am new to the forum, and glad to be here. looks like a great place for help when all has failed! :cry:
if you race 2 cans of broth down a ramp, one frozen and one still liquid, which one wins?
well, i did this mathematically, using the equation for a solid ring: V=sqrt[(4/3)gh] which i got from Kinetic energy equations, and the size and mass are irrelevant b/c they cancel out.
the result with this equation says that the frozen can wins, so i was very surprised to find the liquid can whipped the frozen can's butt on a piece of plywood in my backyard.
i have been looking for a way to get a solution through the use of Kenetic energy of: can, translational, and the soup. any help would be very much appreciated, b/c i am stumped. :confused: thanks.
also, for curious reasons, how would you define translational kinetic energy?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Hi there,

Welcome to the forum! It's great to see someone interested in solving this mystery. From your initial calculations, it seems like the frozen can should win since it has a higher velocity due to its lower density. However, as you observed, the liquid can actually won the race.

There are a few factors that could have influenced this result. First, the frozen can may have had a rougher surface which could have caused more friction and slowed it down. Second, the liquid inside the can may have acted as a lubricant, reducing friction and allowing it to slide faster. Third, the liquid may have also had a higher initial velocity due to its lower density and therefore less force needed to accelerate it.

In terms of kinetic energy, translational kinetic energy is the energy an object possesses due to its motion in a straight line. It is calculated using the equation KE=1/2mv^2, where m is the mass of the object and v is its velocity. In this case, the kinetic energy of the can would be equal to the kinetic energy of the soup inside.

I hope this helps in your quest to solve the mystery of the racing cans of broth down a ramp. Keep experimenting and analyzing, and you may find the answer you're looking for. Good luck!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top