Sound Intensity and Threshold of hearing

AI Thread Summary
The equation β= 10log(I1/I2) uses I1 as the threshold of hearing, typically set at 1.0x10^-12 W/m^2, which represents the reference intensity for zero dB. However, I1 can vary when measuring sound intensity not related to human perception, depending on the context of the measurement. The discussion highlights that while the threshold of hearing is a standard reference, different scenarios may require alternative reference levels. Personal experiences with hearing sensitivity, such as the ability to detect lower intensities at specific frequencies, illustrate the variability in human hearing. Understanding the rationale behind using I1 as the threshold of hearing clarifies its application in sound intensity measurements.
gomess
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
My textbook says that in the equation β= 10log(I1/I2), I1 in most cases is the threshold of hearing (1.0x10^-12). Just out of curiosity, when is I1 not the threshold of hearing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
the reference intensity for zero dB, is 1 pico-Watt/m^2 . I can't hear such faint sounds anymore, especially at the edges of my frequency range. I used to be able to hear 1/8 picoWatt/m^2 ... that's -9 dB ... at 880 Hz.
 
gomess said:
My textbook says that in the equation β= 10log(I1/I2), I1 in most cases is the threshold of hearing (1.0x10^-12). Just out of curiosity, when is I1 not the threshold of hearing?

Well sound intensity is the measure of a ratio of two sound intensities, when we are discussing the sound intensity experienced by people, then it is useful to set this 'reference' level at the average threshold of human hearing. In any situation when you are not concerned with sound intensity as experienced by people, you might choose a different reference level, it would depend on what you wanted to measure.
 
Oh okay, i see that makes more sense. I was always wondering why we placed that value as I1, there seemed to be no explanation from my book, it simply stated to do so
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Ratio of Intensities of 2 sounds
Replies
5
Views
2K
Sound Intensity: Thresholds of Hearing & Ratio Calculation
Replies
1
Views
4K
Rock Group Performs in Bar: How Far Can You Hear?
Replies
5
Views
9K
Solving Current & Power in 4 & 3 Wire Circuits
Replies
9
Views
2K
How Far Can You Hear the Siren at 2400 Hz?
Replies
1
Views
2K
Calculating Power at source from Intensity at distance R
Replies
1
Views
4K
Find emf and the inner resistor of the battery
Replies
7
Views
2K
Sound Intensity (Level) - Hearing Aid
Replies
5
Views
2K
Sound Intensity and Bird Watching
Replies
3
Views
2K
Sound intensities in hearing aids
Replies
2
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top