Spacecraft orbit homework problem

kreil
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
665
Reaction score
68

Homework Statement


Suppose a spacecraft of speed v_c is in a circular orbit around the Earth at a height H from the surface of the earth. The rocket motor is fired in the opposite direction of motion to reduce the satellite's speed to v_0 and make the orbit elliptical. Let R denote the Earth's radius and g the gravitational acceleration on the surface of the earth.

A. Express v_c in terms of R, H, and g.

B. For the spacecraft to land on the Earth surface horizontally at the perigee of the elliptic orbit, find v_0 in terms of R, H, and g. Ignore friction.

C. Express the eccentricity of the elliptic orbit in terms of R and H.

The Attempt at a Solution



For part A I just used the energy equation for a circular orbit, noting r=R+H, k=GMm and g=GM/R^2,

E = T+V=\frac{1}{2}mv_c^2 - \frac{k}{r} = -\frac{k}{2r}

v_c=\left ( \frac{gR^2}{R+H} \right )^{1/2}

For part B, I redid the work from part A for an ellipse, i.e.

E = T+V=\frac{1}{2}mv_0^2 - \frac{k}{r} = -\frac{k}{2a}

v_0 = \sqrt{2gR} \left [ R \left (\frac{1}{r}-\frac{1}{2a} \right ) \right ]^{1/2}

This is where I start having problems. The problem asks for v0 in terms of R, H, and g..but is it not true that when the spacecraft is landing at perigee H=0 and r=R?

The answer I ended up getting for this part came from using r=R=a(1-e) where e is the eccentricity, but I feel shaky about this.

Any thoughts on part B?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


This is my opinion.

Point v_0 is the farthest point and
<br /> v_0 \ \bot \ R+H.<br />

The nearest point is R.

So we can conclude that

<br /> 2a=2R+H.<br />
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top