Specific Heat Capacity of a cylinder in boiling water

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the specific heat capacity of an unknown metal by analyzing its interaction with boiling water. The initial temperature of the boiling water is confirmed to be 98°C, not 100°C, which affects the calculations. The heat gained by the water, calculated as 530 cal, is equated to the heat lost by the metal, but the temperature change for the metal needs to be accurately determined. Participants emphasize that the temperature change for the metal is not the same as that for the water, and it should be adjusted accordingly. Correcting these values is essential for obtaining an accurate specific heat capacity for the metal.
DavisonH
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Finding the specific heat capacity of an unknown metal.

A cylinder was placed into boiling water, originally at 24.2 C. The heat transferred from the metal, and the water then was 29.5 C.

Original Temperature-24.2 C
Temperature after the metal has been placed into the water.-29.5 C

m=mass of water (100 g)
C=Specific Heat of Water (1 C)
deltaT=Change of Temperature in water=5.3 (29.5-24.2)

Metal

M=Mass of metal (86.79 g)
deltaT=? (I think it is 5.3, equivalent to the change of temperature in the water)
C=?

I am not entirely sure what I am doing wrong. I thought that the heat gained by the water is equivalent to the heat lost by the metal, therefore the change

Homework Equations



Q=mCdeltaT

Q/m*deltaT=c

The Attempt at a Solution



First I found the heat gained by the water by using the formula Q=mCdeltaT.

Where
m=mass of water (100 g)
C=Specific Heat of Water (1 C)
deltaT=Change of Temperature in water=5.3 (29.5-24.2)

Q=100x1x5.3

Therefore Q=530

Next, I used the Q to calculate the specific heat capacity of the unknown metal.

Q=mCdeltaT, with the variables changed to Q/m*deltaT=c
Where
Q=Heat Gained by Water/Lost by metal (530)
m=Mass of metal (86.79 g)
deltaT=This is what I am unsure about. Would the heat lost by the metal be equivalent to the heat gained by the water? Which would equal to 5.3 C.

If I calculate using that assumption for Delta T the answer equals 1.15 c/ g cal which is quite high for the specific heat capacity of a metal.

Was my process correct?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to Physics Forums :smile:

Think about this: what is the initial temperature of the boiling water?
 
Thanks!

The initial temperature of the boiling water is 98 C.

Then I think it would go like this

(86.79) C (100 C - 29.5C) = (100g) (1 cal/g-C)(5.3C)

(86.79) (70.5C) C = 530

6118.7 C = 530

C = 0.0866 cal/g-C
 
Getting there, but there are still some problems.

DavisonH said:
Thanks!

The initial temperature of the boiling water is 98 C.
Well, you're close, but ... hey, come on, what temperature does water boil at? :wink:

Then I think it would go like this

(86.79) C (100 C - 29.5C) = (100g) (1 cal/g-C)(5.3C)
Hmmm. Okay, one side of that equation refers to the water, and the other side of the equation refers to the metal. Which is which?
 
The boiling point of water is 100 C, but the water measured in the lab as at 98 C.

The left side is the metal, the right the water.
 
DavisonH said:
The boiling point of water is 100 C, but the water measured in the lab as at 98 C.
Understood, thanks for clarifying.

DavisonH said:
(86.79) C (100 C - 29.5C) = (100g) (1 cal/g-C)(5.3C)
.
.
.
The left side is the metal, the right the water.
The metal does not go from 100C to 29.5C. The temperature change of the water is not 5.3C, that is ΔT for the metal.
Fix those temperatures, then you should have it ... and remember, the water starts out at 98C.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top