Specific Heat Capacity of solids liquid or Gas, which is largest?

In summary, the question of which state of matter has a larger specific heat capacity (shc) can be answered by looking at the different types of energy that are involved in each state. Solids have the highest shc because their molecules are closely packed and can easily pass on heat energy through vibrations. Gases have a lower shc because their molecules are further apart and heat energy is transferred through collisions. Liquids have the lowest shc because their molecules are bonded together, restricting the movement of heat energy. However, water is an exception to this as it has the highest shc in all three states due to its polar nature and complex physics.
  • #1
matthew77ask
45
0
This questions puzzles me:

Which has a larger specific heat capacity (shc) : solid, liquid or gas.
We can assume that it is of the same matter. Why?

I have checked the numbers. Only water has it on all three states. Liq water has the highest, while that of ice and steam is about the same.

We are not talking about thermal conductivity here. If we are then kinetic particle theory will point to solid > Liq> Gas in thermal conductivity because of the closer solid particles can "pass" on the heat fastest compared to the further gas particles.

Can the same theory applies when it comes to shc? the amount of heat needed to raised the temp by 1 degree C? if it can then the order would be shc of gas > liq > solid. But this is not the case for water...

Is SHC of a matter a function of the matter itself rather than the closeness of the particle.

Sorry, fired up a lot of questions... hope someone can enlighten me and take some heat away :smile:


Cheers!
Matthew
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
matthew77ask said:
This questions puzzles me:

Which has a larger specific heat capacity (shc) : solid, liquid or gas.
We can assume that it is of the same matter. Why?

I have checked the numbers. Only water has it on all three states. Liq water has the highest, while that of ice and steam is about the same.

We are not talking about thermal conductivity here. If we are then kinetic particle theory will point to solid > Liq> Gas in thermal conductivity because of the closer solid particles can "pass" on the heat fastest compared to the further gas particles.
Temperature is the measure of the average kinetic energy of the molecules. In ice, the energy added results in increased vibrational energy of the water molecules (all kinetic). In steam, added energy results in increased translational, vibrational and rotational energy (all kinetic). In liquid water, however, not all of the added energy results in kinetic energy of the molecules. Can you think why this would be? (think of bonds between water molecules).

AM
 
  • #3
Andrew Mason said:
Temperature is the measure of the average kinetic energy of the molecules. In ice, the energy added results in increased vibrational energy of the water molecules (all kinetic). In steam, added energy results in increased translational, vibrational and rotational energy (all kinetic). In liquid water, however, not all of the added energy results in kinetic energy of the molecules. Can you think why this would be? (think of bonds between water molecules).

AM
If I understanding this correctly:

In solids (eg ice) heat will cause the avg ke (vibration at fixed location)of the molecules to increase faster cos they are closely pack. So a small amount of heat energy (Joules) will be enough to raise the temp by 1 C.

In gases (eg steam) although the dist between the molecules are far, the heat energy increases the movement of the molecules (as in molecules will move about faster) and hence pass the heat energy around by banging each other (the small bangs theory :wink: fly and bang ). Hence small amount of heat energy will be enough to raise the temp by 1 C.

In liquids (eg water), however, the molecules are neither very closely pack (so that heat can pass by juz pure vibration) nor very far apart (so heat can pass via flying around and banging others). The molecules in liquid are bonded by van der waals forces and some other forces (eg H-bond). So the movements are very restricted compared to gases, and heat energy cannot be passed via the fly and bang method. Nor heat can pass quickly by vibrating and passing the heat to your next door neighbour as in the case of solids. So a larger amount of heat energy is needed to raise the temp by 1C.

Am I correct so far?


Thanks
 
  • #4
All substances have a specific heat in solid, liquid or gas. Water is just rather ubiquitous.

One has to consider not only the atomic/molecular mass, but the structure, e.g. elemental vs molecular/chemical.

See - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Specific_heat_capacity - explanation and table.

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/tables/sphtt.html#c1 - table of specific heats.
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/thermo/dulong.html

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/kinetic/shegas.html - gases

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/thermo/phase.html - water and phase change
 
  • #5
matthew77ask said:
If I understanding this correctly:

In solids (eg ice) heat will cause the avg ke (vibration at fixed location)of the molecules to increase faster cos they are closely pack. So a small amount of heat energy (Joules) will be enough to raise the temp by 1 C.

In gases (eg steam) although the dist between the molecules are far, the heat energy increases the movement of the molecules (as in molecules will move about faster) and hence pass the heat energy around by banging each other (the small bangs theory :wink: fly and bang ). Hence small amount of heat energy will be enough to raise the temp by 1 C.

In liquids (eg water), however, the molecules are neither very closely pack (so that heat can pass by juz pure vibration) nor very far apart (so heat can pass via flying around and banging others). The molecules in liquid are bonded by van der waals forces and some other forces (eg H-bond). So the movements are very restricted compared to gases, and heat energy cannot be passed via the fly and bang method. Nor heat can pass quickly by vibrating and passing the heat to your next door neighbour as in the case of solids. So a larger amount of heat energy is needed to raise the temp by 1C.

Am I correct so far?
Not quite. But you are thinking. This is a good question and it is not an easy one to figure out. The physics of water, which is a polar molecule, is complicated.

But here are are few comments.

Heat is energy. Heat 'passes' due to molecular collisions. Temperature is the measure of molecular kinetic energy, not heat. So, if more heat is needed to raise the temperature of a mole of liquid water one degree than a mole of steam one degree, this means that some of that heat energy is not going into kinetic energy of the liquid water molecules. So what is it going into? It must be going into breaking the hydrogen bonds that water molecules form with each other. This does not happen in ice or steam, since those bonds are not being broken or are already broken. The warmer the water, the more vapour molecules there are breaking those hydrogen bonds (and escaping from the surface). This is why water vapour pressure increases with temperature.

AM
 
  • #6
Thanks AM, not sure if I comprehen it fully.

I think I may be using the 'wrong' example - water. because of it's nature.

But in other matter - would SHC of solid > liq > gas or other way round. Or is there a pattern at all?

cheers!
 
  • #7
matthew77ask said:
Thanks AM, not sure if I comprehen it fully.

I think I may be using the 'wrong' example - water. because of it's nature.

But in other matter - would SHC of solid > liq > gas or other way round. Or is there a pattern at all?

cheers!
It depends on the bonds between the molecules in the liquid. If the bonds are realtively stong hydrogen bonds (such as in water), a lot of the heat energy will be used in breaking those bonds, so the liquid will have a higher heat capacity. If the molecular bonds are weak (eg. Vanderwaals forces) not much heat will be used. So the heat capacities of liquid metals will not be much different than the heat capacities of the solid metals.

AM
 
  • #8
AM:
'''' If the bonds are realtively stong hydrogen bonds (such as in water), a lot of the heat energy will be used in breaking those bonds, so the liquid will have a higher heat capacity ''''

Hi AM,

According to your quote above, a higher cp is because bonds are constantly being formed or broken. However, bonds are formed only at the melting/evaporating points, and not throughout the sensible heating of the liquid form.
I believe it depends on the energy balance between the kinetic energy (all forms: translational, vibrational & rotational) and the inter-molecular potential energy. As the molecular structure becomes looser in a liquid from a solid, the molecules are more free to move, but restricted by the intermolecular forces. Hence the heat input is used for the kinetic energy (all types - compared to only vibrational for solids) but also as work against the intermolecular forces. Work against the bonds does not mean breaking them, but if you want 'stretching' them. When the melting temp is reached, the kinetic energy has reached its apex in the liquid form, and all energy is used to only break the intermolecular bonds = melting.

Hope this helps...
BLG
 

1. What is specific heat capacity?

The specific heat capacity of a substance is the amount of heat energy required to raise the temperature of 1 gram of the substance by 1 degree Celsius.

2. How is specific heat capacity measured?

Specific heat capacity is typically measured using a calorimeter, which is a device that measures the heat exchange between a substance and its surroundings.

3. Is the specific heat capacity of solids, liquids, or gases larger?

The specific heat capacity of a substance depends on its physical state and can vary significantly. In general, the specific heat capacity of gases is lower than that of liquids, which is lower than that of solids.

4. Why does the specific heat capacity differ between states of matter?

The specific heat capacity depends on the molecular structure of a substance and how tightly the molecules are packed together. In gases, the molecules are more spread out and have less interaction, leading to a lower specific heat capacity compared to liquids and solids.

5. How does specific heat capacity affect heat transfer?

Substances with higher specific heat capacities require more heat energy to raise their temperature, so they are able to absorb and release heat more slowly. This can be useful in regulating temperature changes in the environment and in various industrial processes.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
547
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
54
Views
6K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
4
Views
572
Back
Top