Specifying vertical asymptotes in periodic functions in set notation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the correct set notation for specifying vertical asymptotes and the domain of periodic functions. A periodic function with a period of π/2 and a vertical asymptote at π/4 can be expressed as { x: x ∈ R, x ≠ n⋅(π/2)+(π/4) }, where n is an integer. Participants confirmed the accuracy of this notation by demonstrating its application with various integer values for n, effectively excluding the asymptotes from the domain. The use of LaTeX for clearer representation of mathematical symbols was also recommended.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of periodic functions and their properties
  • Familiarity with vertical asymptotes in mathematical analysis
  • Knowledge of set notation and its applications in mathematics
  • Basic proficiency in LaTeX for mathematical formatting
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of periodic functions, specifically focusing on tangent functions like f(x) = tan(2x)
  • Explore advanced set notation techniques for representing domains and asymptotes
  • Learn how to use LaTeX for mathematical expressions and symbols
  • Investigate the implications of vertical asymptotes on the behavior of periodic functions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, educators, and students studying calculus or advanced mathematics, particularly those focusing on periodic functions and their characteristics.

SubZer0
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
What is the general format for specifying recurring vertical asymptotes in periodic functions in set notation?
Relevant Equations
-2pi < x < 2pi
Hi all,

What is the general set notation for specifying a vertical asymptote and domain for a periodic function? For example, if I have a periodic function which has a period of pi/2, and within that period, a vertical asymptote occurs at pi/4. The domain is R, excluding that vertical asymptote. I am presuming that I can specify it something like:

{ x: x ∈ R, x ≠ n⋅(pi/2)+(pi/4) }, where n is an integer.

Does this look correct, or completely off?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
SubZer0 said:
Hi all,

What is the general set notation for specifying a vertical asymptote and domain for a periodic function? For example, if I have a periodic function which has a period of pi/2, and within that period, a vertical asymptote occurs at pi/4. The domain is R, excluding that vertical asymptote. I am presuming that I can specify it something like:

{ x: x ∈ R, x ≠ n⋅(pi/2)+(pi/4) }, where n is an integer.

Does this look correct, or completely off?

Thanks!
Looks OK to me. An example of a function with this behavior is ##f(x) = \tan(2x)##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: SubZer0
SubZer0 said:
Hi all,

What is the general set notation for specifying a vertical asymptote and domain for a periodic function? For example, if I have a periodic function which has a period of pi/2, and within that period, a vertical asymptote occurs at pi/4. The domain is R, excluding that vertical asymptote. I am presuming that I can specify it something like:

{ x: x ∈ R, x ≠ n⋅(pi/2)+(pi/4) }, where n is an integer.

Does this look correct, or completely off?

Thanks!
Let's check it out.
If n=0, then you are excluding π/4 from the domain. That's good.

If n=1, then you are excluding 3π/4 from the domain. That's good.

If n = −1, then you are excluding −π/4 from the domain. That's good.

Etc.

I'm curious about the inequality, −2pi < x < 2pi , that you have in the Relevant Equations .

Also, you can find many symbols by clicking on the icon 3rd from the right in the light blue banner at the top of the "Reply/Post thread" box.

242415

Using that, your result of
{ x: x ∈ R, x ≠ n⋅(pi/2)+(pi/4) }
becomes:
{ x: x ∈ ℝ, x ≠ n⋅(π/2)+(π/4) }

Even better, use LaTeX.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: SubZer0
Thanks, Mark44 and SammyS for your responses. Have taken on board your advice for the symbols for future posts, SammyS.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K