Spherically symmetric charge density given electric potential

AI Thread Summary
A spherically symmetric charge distribution leads to a specific form of electric potential, prompting the need to determine the charge distribution. The electric field can be calculated using E = -∇V in spherical coordinates, with a focus on the difference in electric field between two radial points. The discussion highlights the challenge of simplifying the resulting equations to express charge density, with suggestions to neglect higher-order terms and integrate from 0 to r. By applying Gauss' Law, one can algebraically solve for the charge density, ρ. The conversation emphasizes the importance of careful manipulation of variables and integration techniques in deriving the desired form.
stauber28
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
1. A spherically symmetric charge distribution results in an electric potential of the form
pt1.jpg


What is the charge distribution?

2.
Hint: consider the difference in electric field between two values of r
pt2.jpg


Show that the answer is of the form
pt3.jpg



3. I have attempted several solutions but haven't gotten anywhere.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Did you at least calculate the electric field?

E = - ∇ V where the gradient is in spherical coordinates.
 
I calculated E using the first equation. E=dV/dr
 
Correction E=-dv/dr <-- I am unsure to just have dr=dr or dr = (the derivative of everything in the 1st equations brackets[] ) - I decided to just have it equal dr

I then plugged the E value into the difference equation with r = r, and r' = (r+dr). I took the difference and set it equal to the right side of the same equation, and then solved for p(r). I hoped this would give me something in the form of charge density noted. However, I ended up with a large number of variables which would not simplify to this form.

Any Insights?
 
Last edited:
You have the right approach. You can neglect the higher-order terms. Keep only the terms proportional to dr.
 
You can have r'=0 and just integrate the right side of the equation from 0 to r. You now have Gauss' Law, and you can just solve algebraically for \rho.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top