Springs and Hooke's Law: Understanding Force and Work Calculations

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving Hooke's Law and the calculations of force and work related to stretching a spring. The original poster attempts to determine the force and work required to stretch a spring with a given force constant.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the application of Hooke's Law and the relationship between force and displacement. Questions arise regarding the calculation of work done on the spring, particularly the misunderstanding of using final force multiplied by displacement.

Discussion Status

Some participants provide guidance on the need to consider that the force exerted on the spring is not constant during stretching. There is an ongoing exploration of the concept of elastic potential energy and its relation to work done on the spring. Multiple interpretations of the problem and its requirements are being discussed.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of the original poster's course constraints, including a focus on algebra and trigonometry, with a lack of familiarity with calculus concepts that could simplify the problem. Additionally, the discussion highlights the need to clarify the specific requirements of the problem regarding the work done in different segments of stretching the spring.

rolodexx
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Springs and Hooke's law

Homework Statement


An unstretched spring has a force constant of 1200 N/m. How large a force and how much work are required to stretch the spring by 1.00 m from its unstretched length?


Homework Equations



F= -k*s

W= F * s

The Attempt at a Solution



I used Hooke's law and obtained a force of 1200 N (which was correct). But the displacement is only 1 meter, so work should have also been 1200 (J). But it's wrong anyway.

The second part of the problem asks "How large a force and how much work are required to stretch the spring by 1.00 m beyond the length reached in part (a)?" so I multiplied the force constant by 2 to get 2400 N, and it was right. However, multiplying 2400 by 2 meters to give W of 4800 J was also incorrect. I don't know what I'm misunderstanding.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
As you do work on the spring to stretch it, the force is not constant. So you can't just multiply the final force times the displacement. (You can integrate, if you know how.)

Hint: Have you studied elastic potential energy? How much energy is stored in a stretched spring?
 
The course I'm in is *supposed* to be algebra and trig-based, but I am quickly learning that using calculus would make my life a lot simpler, if I only remembered how to do that stuff. We also haven't studied elastic potential energy yet... I looked on Wikipedia and it said this was found by integrating Hooke's law (which I would love to do if I knew how) and gave a formula. U = 1/2 (kx[tex]^{2}[/tex]) So I plugged in my values for the force constant and displacement, and got elastic potential energy of 600. I used this as my value for the work done in part a), and 600 J was correct.

However... I tried the same strategy on part b), by using the same force constant and a displacement of 2 meters, but the resulting 2400 J was also wrong. What did you mean by not being able to multiply final force by displacement?
 
rolodexx said:
However... I tried the same strategy on part b), by using the same force constant and a displacement of 2 meters, but the resulting 2400 J was also wrong.
That's because the question asked for the additional work needed to stretch the spring from 1 to 2 meters, not from 0 to 2. (Subtract.)
What did you mean by not being able to multiply final force by displacement?
I was referring to your earlier idea for calculating work. For example, you multiplied 1200 N x 1 m, which is incorrect because the force actually varies from 0 to 1200 N as you stretch the spring.
 
oh! Thank you so much... it definitely helps to "talk" to someone about this instead of just giving up. :smile:
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K