Static Equilibrium and downward force

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the downward force exerted by a boy's hand while carrying a sack on a stick balanced on his shoulder at a 22-degree angle. The mass of the sack is 7 kg, and the calculations involve using torque equations to find the force. Different participants debate the appropriate use of sine and cosine in their torque calculations, particularly regarding the angle's orientation and the moment arm. They explore the relationship between the forces acting on the system, emphasizing the importance of accurately applying the principles of static equilibrium. The conversation highlights the nuances of torque calculation methods and the significance of clear diagrams for understanding the problem.
Meowzers
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
I just want to make sure that I approached the following problem correctly:

A boy carries a sack on one end of a very light stick that is balanced on his shoulder, at an angle of 22.0 degrees up from the horizontal. The mass of the sack is 7.00 kg, and it sits 1.20 m from his shoulder. If his hand is 0.350 m from his shoulder, on the other end of the stick, what is the magnitude of the downward force the boy exerts with his hand?

I drew somewhat of a force diagram, then:

Set x=force of hand
torque of hand + torque of wall = 0
rFcos(theta) + rFsin(theta) = 0
-(.350m)(x)(cos 22) + (1.2m)(9kg*9.8 m/s2)(sin 22) = 0
.3245x = 39.648
x = 122.18 N
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Besides a couple of typos, why did you use the sin theta distance component as the moment arm for the downward force of the boy's hand? And oh if you use weight on right side of equation, you need to use it on left side also (i.e., multiply the mass by g.)
 
Last edited:
Well, in my force diagram, the 22 degree angle is right across from the downward force of the boy's hand. I guess they're just mirror images of each other...

So, the force of both the hand and the sack are Fsin(theta)?

torque of hand + torque of wall = 0
rFsin(theta) + rFsin(theta) = 0
-(.350m)(x)(sin 22) + (1.2m)(9kg*9.8 m/s2)(sin 22) = 0
.13111x = 39.648
x=302.4 N
 
Meowzers said:
Well, in my force diagram, the 22 degree angle is right across from the downward force of the boy's hand. I guess they're just mirror images of each other...

So, the force of both the hand and the sack are Fsin(theta)?

torque of hand + torque of wallyou mean sack?[/color] = 0
rFsin(theta) + rFsin(theta) = 0
-(.350m)(9.8)[/color]x(sin 22) + (1.2m)(9 or 7??[/color]kg*9.8 m/s2)(sin 22) = 0
.13111x = 39.648
x=302.4 N
Without a diagram, it is hard to understand where the 22 degree angle is; but in your statement you said it was up from the horizontal, in whichcase you should use cos 22 on both sides of the equation. There are 2 ways to calculate torques: The first is to take the magnitude of the force and multiply it by the perpendicular distance from the line of action of the force to the point you are taking moments about. In which case you have, for the sack torque,
F(r) cos\theta = 9(9.8)(1.2) cos 22.
OR, you can use the definition of torque
T =Frsin\theta, but here, \thetais the included angle between the force and displacemnt vectors, \theta = 68 degrees.. You will get the same answer; I prefer the first method.
 
Thanks for all your help :)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top