Static Equilibrium: holding a sign

AI Thread Summary
To maintain static equilibrium while holding the sign, the net force and torque must equal zero. The vertical forces acting on the sign include the weight of the sign and the post, leading to the equation FHand = Mg + mg. For torque, the hand must provide a counteracting torque to balance the clockwise torque caused by the sign's weight. The correct approach involves using the vertical post as the axis of rotation, resulting in a torque calculation that confirms the hand's torque must equal the torque from the sign. Ultimately, the solution reveals that the hand applies a downward force and a clockwise torque to keep the system stable.
schwiffty
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


You are holding a sign as shown below. The sign (including the horizontal bar it hangs from) has a mass of 2.20 kg and is 40.5 cm wide. The sign is hanging from a 1.03 m tall, 4.46 kg vertical post. The sign is symmetric with a uniform mass distribution as implied by the drawing

JkCorR5.png


What external force (+ if up, - if down) and torque (+ for CCW, - for CW) do you have to apply with your hand to keep the sign in static equilibrium? [Use g = 9.80 m/s2 and ignore the width of the vertical post.]

Homework Equations



Net Forces = 0

Torques (counter clockwise) = Torques (clockwise)

The Attempt at a Solution



I think that the only forces acting on the sign are vertical so for the net forces equation I have:

Forces up = Forces down =====> FHand = Mg + mg
Where M is the mass of the vertical post and m is the mass of the sign.

For the conservation of torques I have: d * FHand = d*Mg + d*mg
Where d is the lever arm in meters.

(The axis of rotation is at the left side.)

0.405 * FHand = 0.405 * (4.46kg*9.8) + 0.2025 * (2.20kg*9.8)FHand = (17.7017 N*m + 4.3659 N*m) / 0.405 m

FHand = 54.488 N Torque = 22.0676 N*m

This answer is wrong and I do not know why.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
schwiffty said:

Homework Statement


You are holding a sign as shown below. The sign (including the horizontal bar it hangs from) has a mass of 2.20 kg and is 40.5 cm wide. The sign is hanging from a 1.03 m tall, 4.46 kg vertical post. The sign is symmetric with a uniform mass distribution as implied by the drawing

JkCorR5.png


What external force (+ if up, - if down) and torque (+ for CCW, - for CW) do you have to apply with your hand to keep the sign in static equilibrium? [Use g = 9.80 m/s2 and ignore the width of the vertical post.]

Homework Equations



Net Forces = 0

Torques (counter clockwise) = Torques (clockwise)

The Attempt at a Solution



I think that the only forces acting on the sign are vertical so for the net forces equation I have:

Forces up = Forces down =====> FHand = Mg + mg
Where M is the mass of the vertical post and m is the mass of the sign.

For the conservation of torques I have: d * FHand = d*Mg + d*mg
Where d is the lever arm in meters.

(The axis of rotation is at the left side.)

0.405 * FHand = 0.405 * (4.46kg*9.8) + 0.2025 * (2.20kg*9.8)FHand = (17.7017 N*m + 4.3659 N*m) / 0.405 m

FHand = 54.488 N Torque = 22.0676 N*m

This answer is wrong and I do not know why.
Your vertical force calculation looks okay, but I'm not understanding your torque equations. The vertical post itself would not require a torque to keep vertical. What are you taking as the mass and center of mass for the torque from the sign?
 
  • Like
Likes schwiffty
Hello, Welcome to PF!
schwiffty said:
What external force (+ if up, - if down) and torque (+ for CCW, - for CW) do you have to apply with your hand to keep the sign in static equilibrium? [Use g = 9.80 m/s2 and ignore the width of the vertical post.]
Note that the hand applies both a force and a torque. The torque is in the form of a "couple". The torque due to a couple is independent of the choice of location of the axis of rotation.

I think that the only forces acting on the sign are vertical so for the net forces equation I have:

Forces up = Forces down =====> FHand = Mg + mg
Where M is the mass of the vertical post and m is the mass of the sign.
Does this give the correct answer for FHand?

For the conservation of torques I have: d * FHand = d*Mg + d*mg
Where d is the lever arm in meters.

(The axis of rotation is at the left side.)
You did not include the torque (couple) provided by the hand.
I recommend taking the axis of rotation to be some point on the vertical rod.
 
  • Like
Likes schwiffty
TSny said:
Hello, Welcome to PF!

Note that the hand applies both a force and a torque. The torque is in the form of a "couple". The torque due to a couple is independent of the choice of location of the axis of rotation.Does this give the correct answer for FHand? You did not include the torque (couple) provided by the hand.
I recommend taking the axis of rotation to be some point on the vertical rod.

Hi!

I can't find out if my answer for the force of the hand is correct because the question requires both parts to be entered to tell me if its right.

When you say the torque is in the form of a couple, does this mean that there is some horizontal force acting on the vertical bar I need to solve for?
 
schwiffty said:
Hi!

I can't find out if my answer for the force of the hand is correct because the question requires both parts to be entered to tell me if its right.
I see.

When you say the torque is in the form of a couple, does this mean that there is some horizontal force acting on the vertical bar I need to solve for?
See figure below. The couple can be thought of as due to the two red forces f. You do not need to find f. You just need to find ##\tau_H##.
 

Attachments

  • Couple and Force of Hand.png
    Couple and Force of Hand.png
    4.1 KB · Views: 536
  • Like
Likes berkeman
Turns out I just needed to use the vertical post/hand as the axis of rotation, giving me a torques equation of:

0.2025 * 2.20kg * 9.8 = Torques CW

(torque caused by the sign) = (torque provided by the hand to keep the system in static equilibrium)

... giving me an answer of -4.3659, negative since its clockwise.

Thanks TSny and berkeman.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top