Static Equilibrium: holding a sign

AI Thread Summary
To maintain static equilibrium while holding the sign, the net force and torque must equal zero. The vertical forces acting on the sign include the weight of the sign and the post, leading to the equation FHand = Mg + mg. For torque, the hand must provide a counteracting torque to balance the clockwise torque caused by the sign's weight. The correct approach involves using the vertical post as the axis of rotation, resulting in a torque calculation that confirms the hand's torque must equal the torque from the sign. Ultimately, the solution reveals that the hand applies a downward force and a clockwise torque to keep the system stable.
schwiffty
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


You are holding a sign as shown below. The sign (including the horizontal bar it hangs from) has a mass of 2.20 kg and is 40.5 cm wide. The sign is hanging from a 1.03 m tall, 4.46 kg vertical post. The sign is symmetric with a uniform mass distribution as implied by the drawing

JkCorR5.png


What external force (+ if up, - if down) and torque (+ for CCW, - for CW) do you have to apply with your hand to keep the sign in static equilibrium? [Use g = 9.80 m/s2 and ignore the width of the vertical post.]

Homework Equations



Net Forces = 0

Torques (counter clockwise) = Torques (clockwise)

The Attempt at a Solution



I think that the only forces acting on the sign are vertical so for the net forces equation I have:

Forces up = Forces down =====> FHand = Mg + mg
Where M is the mass of the vertical post and m is the mass of the sign.

For the conservation of torques I have: d * FHand = d*Mg + d*mg
Where d is the lever arm in meters.

(The axis of rotation is at the left side.)

0.405 * FHand = 0.405 * (4.46kg*9.8) + 0.2025 * (2.20kg*9.8)FHand = (17.7017 N*m + 4.3659 N*m) / 0.405 m

FHand = 54.488 N Torque = 22.0676 N*m

This answer is wrong and I do not know why.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
schwiffty said:

Homework Statement


You are holding a sign as shown below. The sign (including the horizontal bar it hangs from) has a mass of 2.20 kg and is 40.5 cm wide. The sign is hanging from a 1.03 m tall, 4.46 kg vertical post. The sign is symmetric with a uniform mass distribution as implied by the drawing

JkCorR5.png


What external force (+ if up, - if down) and torque (+ for CCW, - for CW) do you have to apply with your hand to keep the sign in static equilibrium? [Use g = 9.80 m/s2 and ignore the width of the vertical post.]

Homework Equations



Net Forces = 0

Torques (counter clockwise) = Torques (clockwise)

The Attempt at a Solution



I think that the only forces acting on the sign are vertical so for the net forces equation I have:

Forces up = Forces down =====> FHand = Mg + mg
Where M is the mass of the vertical post and m is the mass of the sign.

For the conservation of torques I have: d * FHand = d*Mg + d*mg
Where d is the lever arm in meters.

(The axis of rotation is at the left side.)

0.405 * FHand = 0.405 * (4.46kg*9.8) + 0.2025 * (2.20kg*9.8)FHand = (17.7017 N*m + 4.3659 N*m) / 0.405 m

FHand = 54.488 N Torque = 22.0676 N*m

This answer is wrong and I do not know why.
Your vertical force calculation looks okay, but I'm not understanding your torque equations. The vertical post itself would not require a torque to keep vertical. What are you taking as the mass and center of mass for the torque from the sign?
 
  • Like
Likes schwiffty
Hello, Welcome to PF!
schwiffty said:
What external force (+ if up, - if down) and torque (+ for CCW, - for CW) do you have to apply with your hand to keep the sign in static equilibrium? [Use g = 9.80 m/s2 and ignore the width of the vertical post.]
Note that the hand applies both a force and a torque. The torque is in the form of a "couple". The torque due to a couple is independent of the choice of location of the axis of rotation.

I think that the only forces acting on the sign are vertical so for the net forces equation I have:

Forces up = Forces down =====> FHand = Mg + mg
Where M is the mass of the vertical post and m is the mass of the sign.
Does this give the correct answer for FHand?

For the conservation of torques I have: d * FHand = d*Mg + d*mg
Where d is the lever arm in meters.

(The axis of rotation is at the left side.)
You did not include the torque (couple) provided by the hand.
I recommend taking the axis of rotation to be some point on the vertical rod.
 
  • Like
Likes schwiffty
TSny said:
Hello, Welcome to PF!

Note that the hand applies both a force and a torque. The torque is in the form of a "couple". The torque due to a couple is independent of the choice of location of the axis of rotation.Does this give the correct answer for FHand? You did not include the torque (couple) provided by the hand.
I recommend taking the axis of rotation to be some point on the vertical rod.

Hi!

I can't find out if my answer for the force of the hand is correct because the question requires both parts to be entered to tell me if its right.

When you say the torque is in the form of a couple, does this mean that there is some horizontal force acting on the vertical bar I need to solve for?
 
schwiffty said:
Hi!

I can't find out if my answer for the force of the hand is correct because the question requires both parts to be entered to tell me if its right.
I see.

When you say the torque is in the form of a couple, does this mean that there is some horizontal force acting on the vertical bar I need to solve for?
See figure below. The couple can be thought of as due to the two red forces f. You do not need to find f. You just need to find ##\tau_H##.
 

Attachments

  • Couple and Force of Hand.png
    Couple and Force of Hand.png
    4.1 KB · Views: 540
  • Like
Likes berkeman
Turns out I just needed to use the vertical post/hand as the axis of rotation, giving me a torques equation of:

0.2025 * 2.20kg * 9.8 = Torques CW

(torque caused by the sign) = (torque provided by the hand to keep the system in static equilibrium)

... giving me an answer of -4.3659, negative since its clockwise.

Thanks TSny and berkeman.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top