Static equilibrium: mass on beam

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the static equilibrium of a mass on a beam, analyzing forces and moments around different fulcrums. The correct expressions for the forces exerted by the left and right fulcrums, ##F_L## and ##F_R##, are derived using Newton's laws, but errors arise when substituting these into linear equations. The main issue identified is the omission of the beam's weight in the calculations, leading to incorrect results for ##F_L## and ##F_R##. The importance of careful algebra and accurate force accounting is emphasized in solving static equilibrium problems. Properly including all forces is crucial for achieving correct answers in such scenarios.
jkfjbw
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
A horizontal bar of length ##L## and mass ##m_B## is on two fulcrums, one ##L/3## from the left side of the bar, and the other ##L/3## from the right side of the bar. There is also a mass of mass ##m_D## on the left end of the bar. Find the forces that the fulcrums exert on the bar.
Relevant Equations
$$\sum_i \vec{F}_i = \vec{0}$$
$$\sum_i \tau_{z,i} = 0$$
A diagram of the physical situation is below:
IMG_1312.jpg

Choosing the positive ##y## direction to be upwards and the positive direction of rotation to be counterclockwise, Newton's linear second law gives:
$$-m_D g + F_L + F_R = 0$$
where ##F_L## is the magnitude of the force exerted on the bar by the left fulcrum, and ##F_R## is the magnitude of the force exerted on the bar by the right fulcrum. Taking the point of rotation to be around the left fulcrum, Newton's rotational second law gives:
$$(m_D g)\Big(\frac{L}{3}\Big) + F_R\Big(\frac{L}{3}\Big) - (m_B g)\Big(\frac{L}{6}\Big) = 0\\
m_D g + F_R - \frac{1}{2} m_B g = 0\\
F_R = g\Big(\frac{1}{2}m_B - m_D\Big)$$
which is the correct answer for ##F_R##. The problem comes when I try to find ##F_L## by using Newton's linear second law to eliminate ##F_R## and solve for ##F_L##. Doing so gives:
$$m_D g + m_D g - F_L - \frac{1}{2}m_B g = 0\\
F_L = 2m_D g - \frac{1}{2}m_B g\\
F_L = g\Big(2m_B - \frac{1}{2}m_B\Big)$$
which is the wrong answer for ##F_L##.

Likewise, I can also take the point of rotation to be around the right fulcrum:
$$(m_D g)\Big(\frac{2}{3}L\Big) - F_L\Big(\frac{L}{3}\Big) + (m_B g)\Big(\frac{L}{6}\Big) = 0\\
2m_D g - F_L + \frac{1}{2}m_B g = 0\\
F_L = g\Big(2m_D + \frac{1}{2}m_B\Big)$$
which is the correct answer for ##F_L##. However, if I use Newton's linear second law to eliminate ##F_L## and solve for ##F_R##, I get the wrong answer:
$$2m_D g - m_D g + F_R + \frac{1}{2}m_B g = 0\\
m_D g + F_R + \frac{1}{2}m_B g = 0\\
F_R = -g\Big(m_D + \frac{1}{2}m_B\Big)$$

Why do I get the wrong answer for ##F_L## and ##F_R## when I substitute Newton's linear second law into the known-correct answer for ##F_R## and ##F_L##?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your static equilibrium equation for summed forces in the y direction is wrong. You are leaving out some forces. Watch your subscripts also for mb vs. md. And check your algebra.
 
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban
Ah yes, I forgot the weight of the bar in Newton's linear second law. Thank you.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top