Static equilibrium problem:A-shaped ladder

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a static equilibrium problem involving an A-shaped ladder with uniform rods. The ladder's weight and the tension in the connecting wire are key factors, and the challenge lies in calculating the tension without knowing the angle of the ladder. Participants suggest using a free body diagram to analyze forces and torques, emphasizing the importance of summing torques about the hinge point. Calculating angles using geometry and applying the cross product rule for torque calculations are recommended strategies. Understanding these concepts is crucial for determining the correct tension in the wire.
jonathng
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A ladder is made in the shape of the letter A. Treat the two sides of the ladder as identical uniform rods, each weighing 455 N, with a length of 3.60 m. A frictionless hinge connects the two ends at the top, and a horizontal wire, 1.20 m long, connects them at a distance 1.40 m from the hinge, as measured along the sides. The ladder rests on a frictionless floor. What is the tension in the wire?

Homework Equations



Sum of the forces=0

Sum of the torques=0

The Attempt at a Solution



I understand that the ladder can be treated as two separate poles since they are symmetrical. I am just confused as to how to solve it without knowing what the angle is. I tried taking the weight times length (lever arm?) and having that be equal to the tension and the answer I got was 1365N which was incorrect. Any suggestions? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can calculate the angles from geometry. The floor is frictionless. The weight of each diagonal rod acts down at its midpoint measured along the diagonal. If you take a free body diagram of one leg of the ladder and sum torques about the top, you must consider the sum of torques of all forces about that point to solve for the tension force. You can use the cross product rule to calculate torques (Torque = r X F). You might first want to caculate the force reactions from the floor.
 
Oh ok that makes sense. Thanks!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top