Static friction coefficient on different slopes

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves two blocks of equal mass on slopes of 30 and 45 degrees, connected by pulleys. The original poster seeks to determine the static friction coefficient for both blocks, which is assumed to be the same, under the condition that both blocks start sliding simultaneously when a larger mass is applied.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the forces acting on the blocks, including static friction and gravitational components. There is an exploration of the relationship between the angles of the slopes and the forces involved. Questions arise about the assumptions regarding the system's equilibrium and the implications of having the same coefficient of friction for both blocks.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the equations governing the forces, while others have questioned the assumptions about the coefficients of friction and the conditions for simultaneous sliding. There is an ongoing exploration of the relationships between the angles and the forces, with no explicit consensus reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the potential complexity of the problem and the need for clarity regarding the setup, including the role of the pulleys and the assumptions about friction. There is also mention of a conceptual issue regarding the simultaneous release of the blocks given their differing slopes.

Rosengrip
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two blocks with the same mass m = 1 kg are stationary on two slopes with slope angles of 30 and 45 degrees. Both blocks are connected with the larger one in the middle via two pulleys.
Made a sketch to make it clearer:
[PLAIN]http://www.shrani.si/f/1T/kX/NbSonnJ/klanec.jpg

[tex]\alpha[/tex]= 30°
[tex]\beta[/tex]=45°
m = 1 kg
M = mass of the large block in the middle


Question: What is the static friction coefficient of the two blocks, if both of them start sliding at the same time, when M is big enough? Coefficient is the same for both blocks.


Homework Equations


Equation for static friction coefficient:

[tex]\mu[/tex]s = Fs/FN (FS is static friction force, FN is normal force)
FN = mg[tex]\times[/tex]cos[tex]\phi[/tex] (Phi being either 30 or 45 degrees)


The Attempt at a Solution



Both coefficients are the same, so the ratio of both static friction forces and normal forces must be the same.
Now if the system is in equilibrium, both static friction forces must be euqal to the force with which the body in the center with mass M is pulling them upwards the slope (that would me Mxg or Mxg/2 for each block) MINUS the dynamic component of force of mass of each block (which is assisting the static friction force with pulling downwards).
But here it gets messy, as I'm just not sure enough about all the forces involved and how to properly evaluate them and I have a feeling I'm really over complicating things.
I apologize for any nonsense that I've might written and I'd be happy to provide some additional info if it's needed. Thanks in advance.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi Rosengrip! Welcome to PF! :smile:

The question doesn't say so, but I'd assume that there's a third frictionless pulley above mass M, and that the rope is continuous round that pulley (so the tension is the same on both sides). :wink:
 
Thanks :)
Yes you're right, this is the case, I forgot to mention that.
 
So, are you ok now?

If not, show us all the equations you do have. :smile:
 
Well I thought about it a bit and I came up with this:

FD + FS = Mg/2 (FD being a dynamic component of force of mass of a block on slope)

This can be written for both blocks as the force which is pulling them upwards is equal (because of that pulley above mass M), the only different thing are the angles.

If I break the equation down we have:

mgsin([tex]\alpha[/tex]) + [tex]\mu[/tex]S*mgcos([tex]\alpha[/tex]) = Mg/2

for [tex]\alpha[/tex]=30°, same idea for the other block with [tex]\beta[/tex]=45°

I could then express M from the second equation, insert it into the 1st and get the coefficient out of it, since I have all the other info.

Am I going the right way here? :D
 
Hi Rosengrip! :smile:

(just got up :zzz: …)
Rosengrip said:
I could then express M from the second equation, insert it into the 1st and get the coefficient out of it, since I have all the other info.

(have an alpha: α and a beta: β :wink:)

Yes, that's fine, but slightly quicker is to simply put the two LHSs equal (the result won't depend on M or m). :smile:
 
Yep that's definitely faster. Anyways, problem solved, thanks for your time and help! :)
 
Rosengrip said:
Yep that's definitely faster. Anyways, problem solved, thanks for your time and help! :)

I solved this question and got the coefficient of static friction to be 1.3. Is this what you found?

I have a conceptual problem with this question. How can the blocks both be released up the slopes at the same time if they have the same coefficient of friction and the same pulling force up the slope (the tension). Shoudln't it be harder (i.e. require more force) for the steeper ramp since the component of gravity against that motion is larger?

I think that the only way they could release at the same time is if they have different coefficients of static friction.

Is this making sense?
 
hi jtebb! :smile:
jtebb said:
How can the blocks both be released up the slopes at the same time if they have the same coefficient of friction and the same pulling force up the slope (the tension). Shoudln't it be harder (i.e. require more force) for the steeper ramp since the component of gravity against that motion is larger?

sinθ + µcosθ has a minimum (or is it a maximum?) at cotθ = µ (in this case, θ = 37.5°) …

so α and β can be either side of that :wink:

(i suggest you try finding the trig formula for µ in terms of α and β to see how it all fits in …

rewrite µ = cotθ, and use one of the standard https://www.physicsforums.com/library.php?do=view_item&itemid=18" )
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
61
Views
4K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K