Static friction on objects resting on a rotating surface

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the forces of static friction acting on a brick resting on a rotating disc. It is established that static friction provides the necessary centripetal force to keep the brick moving in a circular path. There is confusion regarding whether static friction also acts tangentially to prevent slipping, as the brick maintains a constant speed. It is clarified that static friction can act without causing movement, and during the initial rotation, kinetic friction may have played a role in aligning the brick's speed with that of the disc. Ultimately, the forces involved ensure that the brick does not slip tangentially as the disc rotates.
Darkmisc
Messages
222
Reaction score
31

Homework Statement



Suppose I have a brick that's sitting at the edge of a disc that is rotating clockwise with uniform circular motion.

I what direction(s) are the forces of static friction acting?

Homework Equations



a = v^2/r


The Attempt at a Solution



I know that a centripetal force from static friction acts on the brick to keep it moving in a circle along with the disc. Is there also a static friction force acting on the brick tangentially in a counterclockwise direction to prevent the disc from slipping under the brick?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The brick is moving in a circle with constant speed. What would happen to the
speed of the brick if there was a friction force that wasn't perpendicular to the direction of the velocity?
 
No.

ehild
 
If a force were applied tangentially, the brick would move in non-uniform circular motion (either accelerating or decelerating tangentially).

The trouble I have is with the fact that the force in question is friction; and that static friction can act without causing an object to move.

I'm finding it hard to picture why the disc doesn't slip (tangentially) under the brick, if static friction only points towards the centre of the disc.
 
A body performs uniform circular motion under the effect of the appropriate centripetal force. If the brick moves already together with the disk then the only in-plane force points towards the centre of the disc and equals to mv^/R.

When the disk was in rest and started to rotate, the brick might have slipped at the beginning till the kinetic friction had accelerated it to the velocity equal to its place on the disk. At this starting period, the force had both radial and tangential components.

ehild
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top