Statics of structure, distributed load

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a statics problem involving an L-shaped beam with distributed loads. The user is struggling with understanding how to manage two confounded loads, specifically the interaction between vertical and horizontal distributed loads. Clarification is sought on the nature of the loads, whether they are uniform or varying. Participants emphasize the importance of calculating reaction forces at points A and B before proceeding. The conversation highlights the need for a clear understanding of the load distribution to effectively solve the problem.
Morshed awad
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


All data are in the image uploaded

Homework Equations


I don't know how to deal with two confounded loads

The Attempt at a Solution


I really need fast replies thnak for your attempt
 

Attachments

  • 20171216_165942.jpg
    20171216_165942.jpg
    15.7 KB · Views: 424
Physics news on Phys.org
quad load beam.png

This is not a very difficult problem . You should really have made some effort to solve it yourself .

Start by working out the reaction forces at points A and B . Show us your workings . We'll go on from there .
 

Attachments

  • quad load beam.png
    quad load beam.png
    50.8 KB · Views: 534
Last edited:
Yes i have calculated the reaction forces but the problem tha i don't know how to work with the part wherethe two distributed load are confounded please lead me and i just want to know about the section thank u
 
Not sure I understand the diagram. It seems to be an L shaped beam, assumed rigid at the bend. The distributed load is of uniform density q0 on the vertical section, but what about the horizontal section? The text suggests that is also uniform, but the diagram implies it declines linearly(?) from a max of q0 to zero at the tip.

By "confounded" loads, do you mean the combination of distributed and point loads on the same beam section, or is it the mix of vertical and horizontal loads that bothers you?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top