Stirling engine against solar panels

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the feasibility of using miniature electric motors with pistons and gas containers, covered in highly absorptive materials, to convert sunlight directly into electricity. The original poster questions why such small converters aren't used instead of traditional solar panels, which have a maximum efficiency of around 20%. Responses highlight that the efficiency of heat engines, like Stirling engines, is largely determined by the temperature difference between hot and cold reservoirs, with the best solar thermal generators achieving only about 30% efficiency. The lower temperatures achievable with small engines would result in even lower efficiency. The conversation concludes with an acknowledgment of the importance of understanding thermodynamic principles in evaluating such concepts.
Jarro
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello,
Since childhood, I have been wondering why it is not possible to make miniature electric motors with pistons and gas container covered with a very dark (meaning high absorption coefficient over a wide spectral width) material that would translate the energy of sunlight directly into electricity? In fact, only material and design features will significantly affect the converter efficiency when, as in the case of solar panels, expensive and complex photocells output η of only ~20%. I know that such engines are used on large solar parks (multiple mirrors concentrate solar energy at one point), but why not to simply replace each square meter of each solar panel (meaning literally everywhere it is used) with a such small converter? What did I miss in the concept?
P.S. English isn't my native language, sorry
 
Last edited:
Science news on Phys.org
Do you understand how to calculate the thermodynamic efficiency of a heat engine like a Stirling engine? It is dependent on the temperature difference between the hot reservoir and the cold reservoir. The best solar thermal generators, which (as you said) use concentrating mirror arrays to achieve high temperatures, only achieve an efficiency of about 30%. If you used small engines like you suggest, the temperature achieved would be much lower and the efficiency would be much less.
 
  • Like
Likes Jarro
phyzguy said:
It is dependent on the temperature difference between the hot reservoir and the cold reservoir.
Oh those are the basics I did not pay attention to, thanks.
 
I need to calculate the amount of water condensed from a DX cooling coil per hour given the size of the expansion coil (the total condensing surface area), the incoming air temperature, the amount of air flow from the fan, the BTU capacity of the compressor and the incoming air humidity. There are lots of condenser calculators around but they all need the air flow and incoming and outgoing humidity and then give a total volume of condensed water but I need more than that. The size of the...
Thread 'Why work is PdV and not (P+dP)dV in an isothermal process?'
Let's say we have a cylinder of volume V1 with a frictionless movable piston and some gas trapped inside with pressure P1 and temperature T1. On top of the piston lay some small pebbles that add weight and essentially create the pressure P1. Also the system is inside a reservoir of water that keeps its temperature constant at T1. The system is in equilibrium at V1, P1, T1. Now let's say i put another very small pebble on top of the piston (0,00001kg) and after some seconds the system...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
31
Views
4K
Replies
152
Views
9K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
6K
Back
Top