Strength of cylinder as function of internal pressure

AI Thread Summary
A closed cylinder under internal pressure can significantly increase its load-bearing capacity by preventing buckling, as demonstrated by the comparison between unopened and opened soda cans. Filling an open cylinder with fluid does not effectively enhance its resistance to crushing unless the cylinder is closed, allowing internal pressure to be maintained. The internal pressure generates hoop tension, which helps keep the cylinder's walls straight and prevents buckling under load. The relationship between the necessary supporting pressure and the pressure from the fluid indicates that the required pressure to support the cylinder is generally much higher than that provided by the fluid's weight. Ultimately, internal pressure plays a crucial role in maintaining the structural integrity of a cylinder under load.
johnschmidt
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
I understand that a cylinder oriented vertically and bearing a load can be made more resistant to buckling by adding pressure to the (closed) cylinder. For example, an unopened can of soda pop can bear much more load than an opened soda pop can (I found a youtube video showing an unopened can giving way at 6405 N and an opened can giving way at 890 N).

Can this beneficial pressure also be provided by filling the cylinder with a fluid?

For example, if we have an open cylinder 50m tall and 5m in diameter that needs to support a load, can we increase the load bearing capability of the cylinder by filling it with water (which puts pressure on the walls)? It seems counterintuitive to me that a load in one direction on a material would increase its strength in another direction.

What is the relationship between the pressures necessary to strengthen the cylinder and the pressure from a fluid? Is the strengthening pressure much more or much less than the pressure from the fluid?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When unopened, the soda can is pressurized, which helps prevent the sides from being crushed when the can is handled normally. Once the top is popped, the can can still be easily (and messily) crushed with your hand.

Merely adding fluid to an open cylinder is not going to add much resistance to crushing. For any fluid (or gas) to provide resistance to crushing, the cylinder must be closed to ensure that any internal pressure is not allowed to dissipate if the sides of the cylinder are loaded.
 
So you are saying that the pressure necessary to support the cylinder is much higher than that provided by the weight of the fluid, yes? Hmm, Google suggests the pressure in the unopened can is 117 - 620kPa depending on temperature.

Does anyone know of any equations related to supporting a cylinder bearing a load with internal pressure?
 
A few thoughts.

I think you should consider wall segments of the cylinder as a slender column, which it really is. They are, after all, over 60 times as high as they are thick. So the concepts of column stability come into the wall stability. It takes very little internal pressure to keep the wall straight since the force that will buckle the wall needs the wall to be flexible, which is not the case when under even a small amount of pressure.

When a cylinder is under internal pressure the hoop forces preventing the tube splitting along it's length are twice those trying to lengthen the tube. That hoop tension will keep the section circular while the longitudinal forces keep the walls straight. The internal pressure puts the wall under longitudinal tension due to the fluid pressure on the inside of the ends. The column stability question only becomes relevant once the supported load exceeds the internal pressure and moves the wall into compression. The wall however, is still under hoop tension. That hoop tension is not in the ideal direction to support the load. But the internal pressure that creates the hoop tension prevents the buckling of the column by providing horizontal control throughout the full height of the wall. So in the final analysis the wall is no longer a slender unsupported column, so it does not buckle.
 
Pressure helps support a load because it holds the side walls in vertical tension. In the case of the soda can the area of the top of the can is about 32 cm2 so with a pressure of 500 kpa you have 1600 Newtons of support for the load from the pressure alone. Obviously, given the numbers you quoted in your first post, this is not the only effect, but it is a significant one.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top