Strength of electric field given potential difference

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the strength of the electric field between two parallel conducting plates separated by 1.00 cm with a potential difference of 1.50×10^4 V. The correct formula to use is E = ΔV/d, leading to an electric field strength of 1.5×10^6 N/C. Participants clarify the units of electric field, noting that V/m and N/C are equivalent. The original poster initially struggled but successfully arrived at the solution after some guidance. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the relationship between voltage, distance, and electric field strength.
Mickael14

Homework Statement


What is the strength of the electric field between two parallel conducting plates separated by 1.00 cm and having a potential difference (voltage) between them of 1.50×104 V?

Homework Equations


ΔV = qΔU
ΔV = -∫E⋅dl
E = kq/r2

The Attempt at a Solution


I am not sure where to start. I am looking at the equations available, and I can't seem to figure out where to go from here. I have been struggling with this course in general. If someone could help me out with this, I would really appreciate it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Never mind, I got it. :)
I forgot that qΔV = W and W = Fd, then I can use the substitution F = qE to get qEd = qΔV
So,
E = ΔV/d
E = (1.50x104)/(.01) = 1.5x106 N/C
 
Mickael14 said:
E = ΔV/d
Yes, that is the correct equation for this simple geometry. Good work, and Welcome to the PF. :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes Mickael14
Mickael14 said:
E = (1.50x104)/(.01) = 1.5x106 N/C
BTW, the usual units for E-field are V/m. Can you show the equivalence between V/m and N/C?
 
  • Like
Likes Mickael14
berkeman said:
BTW, the usual units for E-field are V/m. Can you show the equivalence between V/m and N/C?
Oh, sorry I put in in N/C because that is what we had been using. Forgot to change.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top