Stress Concentration around a circular hole on a flat rectangular plate

AI Thread Summary
Finding the analytical solution for stress concentration around a circular hole in a flat rectangular plate under tensile load involves using the stress concentration factor (Kt), which can range up to 3.0 based on the hole size. The Kt value is influenced by the hole diameter and its proximity to the plate edges, as detailed in Peterson's Stress Concentration Factors. For small hole diameters relative to the plate dimensions, simplifications can be made to the differential equations. The regular stress due to the tensile load is multiplied by Kt to determine the stress concentration. This classic mechanics problem is well-documented in standard mechanics of materials texts.
aidiot
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Can anyone help with how to find the analytical solution to problem involving finding the stress concentration around a circular hole in a flat plate.

The plate is has tensile load on both sides.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
That's a classic example that is in any Mechanics of Materials text. Have you done any searching? The calculation, assuming plane stress, is the regular stress due to the tensile load multiplied by a stress concentration factor, Kt. That value ranges up to 3.0 depending on the size of the hole.

Chart 4.1 in Peterson's Stress Concentration Factors gives an empirical formula for the Kt value.
 
Last edited:
For a circular hole, I'd have imagined that Kt would be independent of the radius.
 
Kt is dependent on hole diameter and the distance between the hole edge and the plate edge.
 
Oh, I'm thinking of the limit where the hole diameter is small compared to the dimensions of the plate, and small compared to the distance from the nearest edge. If I was looking for an analytical solution to the DEs, I'd have started from that simplification.
 
thanks for your help guys...

much appreciated
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top