Structural Support Triangles for a rope-climbing robot

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on designing structural support triangles for a rope-climbing robot that weighs approximately 150 lbs. The user is considering adding internal triangles to the plates for increased strength but is struggling with the dimensions and alignment of these smaller triangles. It is suggested that cutting triangular holes may weaken the plate due to stress concentration at sharp corners, and instead, drilling circular holes could be a better option for reducing weight. Additionally, creating a diagram to visualize forces and optimizing the frame design from scratch is recommended for stability and strength. Overall, careful consideration of design and material properties is crucial for the robot's structural integrity.
joshbr32
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
sorry if this is in the wrong spot or what not

So my school has this robotics club and we need to build a robot to climb a rope as well as do other things. But focusing on the rope climbing I need to design 2 plates that can support the weight of the robot (~150lbs)
The plates themselves are large vertical triangles 18" long and 24" tall, placed on either side of the robot 3 bars crossing the two, at the top there will be the main shaft that holds the climber (a hook that spins and grips the rope pulling itself up as the rope wraps around it) and two structural support bars that are lower (around the middle).

So getting to the point I have been told that adding triangles inside will make this plate less likely to snap under the weight and I am wondering if I was to have 6 tiers of triangles, with the space between them being 1" thick, what would the dimensions of the smaller triangles? I've tried to find them via trial and error but it isn't working (the triangles need to be exact copies of one another yet the space in between them should be like one line, if you understand what i mean, but when i do it the lines are offset from one another)

BTW the metal I am using is Aluminum 60601, that is 1/8" thick
I am using inventor if you guys want the file I started to make so you can see what i did wrong I can upload it for you (Link to file+ picture explanation)
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.
Cutting triangular holes will significantly weaken the plate because during flexing under load, energy will be focussed into the sharp corners.

If you need to lighten the plate, consider drilling circular holes, (with a bi-metal hole-saw), rather than triangles.
Make sure the edges of the holes are smooth.
 
May be better to design an optimised frame from scratch .

Set out the positions , magnitudes and directions of all the forces acting in your system on a diagram and then sketch in the minimum number and size of metal links needed to make the system stable and adequately strong . Merge and simplify this arrangement of links into a shaped plate with cutouts .
 
Posted June 2024 - 15 years after starting this class. I have learned a whole lot. To get to the short course on making your stock car, late model, hobby stock E-mod handle, look at the index below. Read all posts on Roll Center, Jacking effect and Why does car drive straight to the wall when I gas it? Also read You really have two race cars. This will cover 90% of problems you have. Simply put, the car pushes going in and is loose coming out. You do not have enuff downforce on the right...
Carburetor CFM A Holley Carb rated at 500 cfm 2 barrel carb has venturi diameter of 1.3/8". There are 2 barrel carbs with 600 cfm and have 1.45 diameter venturi. Looking at the area the 1.378 bore has 5.9 sq. Inch area. The 1.45 dia. has 6.6 sq. inch. 5.9 - 6.6 = 0.70 sq. inch difference. Keeping the 500 cfm carb in place, if I can introduce 0.7 sq inch more area in the intake manifold, will I have the same potential horsepower as a 600 cfm carb provide? Assume I can change jetting to...
I'm trying to decide what size and type of galvanized steel I need for 2 cantilever extensions. The cantilever is 5 ft. The space between the two cantilever arms is a 17 ft Gap the center 7 ft of the 17 ft Gap we'll need to Bear approximately 17,000 lb spread evenly from the front of the cantilever to the back of the cantilever over 5 ft. I will put support beams across these cantilever arms to support the load evenly
Back
Top