Surface Integral over a Cone - Stokes?

YayMathYay
Messages
22
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



zuKnP.png


Homework Equations



I'm guessing Stoke's Theorem? However, I'm not sure how to apply it exactly..

The Attempt at a Solution



Looking at Stoke's Theorem, I'm still not sure how to apply it. I'm really just lost as to where to begin; is there even a \grad F to take? I know this is related to Stoke's (I hope), but not sure how to begin.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
YayMathYay said:

Homework Statement



zuKnP.png


Homework Equations



I'm guessing Stoke's Theorem? However, I'm not sure how to apply it exactly..

The Attempt at a Solution



Looking at Stoke's Theorem, I'm still not sure how to apply it. I'm really just lost as to where to begin; is there even a \grad F to take? I know this is related to Stoke's (I hope), but not sure how to begin.

It doesn't look like Stoke's to me. I don't see any vectors anywhere. Your first job is to figure out what dA is in terms of dx*dy. Then a change to polar coordinates might make it easier to do the dx*dy integral. It's actually pretty straight forward.
 
Last edited:
Dick said:
It doesn't look like Stoke's to me. I don't see any vectors anywhere. Your first job is to figure out what dA is in terms of dx*dy. Then a change to polar coordinates might make it easier to do the dx*dy integral. It's actually pretty straight forward.

I also am trying this formula:

eq0002M.gif


But I'm not getting to 9pi.. I'm not sure what the difference between f(x, y, z) and f(x, y, g(x, y)) is.
 
YayMathYay said:
I also am trying this formula:

eq0002M.gif


But I'm not getting to 9pi.. I'm not sure what the difference between f(x, y, z) and f(x, y, g(x, y)) is.

That's the right direction. Your g(x,y) is just z. Solve your equation for z^2 for z to get g(x,y). It's sqrt(3)*sqrt(x^2+y^2), right?
 
Dick said:
That's the right direction. Your g(x,y) is just z. Solve your equation for z^2 for z to get g(x,y).

I did, that and my integrand on the right side came out to be 2(x^2 + y^2).

But I don't see how to get to the correct answer from that.
 
YayMathYay said:
I did, that and my integrand on the right side came out to be 2(x^2 + y^2).

But I don't see how to get to the correct answer from that.

Ok. That's good. The easiest way to do it from here is to change to polar coordinates. Did you try that?
 
Dick said:
Ok. That's good. The easiest way to do it from here is to change to polar coordinates. Did you try that?

Yes. But if I change to polar, I get 18pi, because of the 2 there.
 
YayMathYay said:
Yes. But if I change to polar, I get 18pi, because of the 2 there.

Which 2? Show your work, ok?
 
Dick said:
Which 2? Show your work, ok?

Urgh, I just didn't want to type it out because I don't know how to use LaTeX and it looks messy.

Integrand: 2(x^2 + y^2) dx dy

Changed to polar w/:
x = sqrt(3) * cos t
y = sqrt(3) * sin t

New Integrand: 6r dr dt [r from 0 to sqrt(3), t from 0 to 2pi]
 
  • #10
YayMathYay said:
Urgh, I just didn't want to type it out because I don't know how to use LaTeX and it looks messy.

Integrand: 2(x^2 + y^2) dx dy

Changed to polar w/:
x = sqrt(3) * cos t
y = sqrt(3) * sin t

New Integrand: 6r dr dt [r from 0 to sqrt(3), t from 0 to 2pi]

And there's your problem. The integrand is supposed to be integrated over r. You don't put a specific value of r in. x^2+y^2 is just r^2.
 
Back
Top