What Are the Forces in Equilibrium for a Weight Hanging on a Rod?

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion about a weight hanging on a rod, participants analyze the forces in equilibrium, focusing on the hinge force and the tension in the wire. A force diagram is created to illustrate the forces acting on the rod, including the weight (mg) and tension components. The conditions for equilibrium are established with equations for horizontal and vertical forces, as well as torque around the wall attachment point. The conversation highlights the importance of considering the vertical reaction force at the hinge, which should be treated as a separate component rather than part of the hinge force. The clarification emphasizes the need to accurately account for all forces to solve for the hinge and tension forces correctly.
laurids
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A light rod is holding a weight with mass m in equilibrium. The rod is attached to the wall with a hinge and a wire as shown on the figure.

http://sveskekat.dk/files/uploads/phys_4.PNG

Problem:
Draw a force diagram of the rod and determine the force with which the hinge affects the rod and the tension force in the wire.

The Attempt at a Solution


I did the force diagram as shown on the figure, with the green arrows as the forces.
I want to determine
The force with which the hinge affects the rod, Fc.
The tension force in the wire, T.

I have that Ww = mg.

I wrote up the conditions for equilibrium,
\sum F_x = F_c - T cos(45) = 0
\sum F_y = T sin(45) - W_r - mg = 0

I do torque around the attachment point on the wall,
\sum \tau = 2amg + aW_r - aF_c = 0

But trying to solve for e.g. F_c now gives me
F_c = cos(45) \frac{F_c - mg}{sin(45)} = F_c - mg,
which is kinda bad. What am I doing wrong??
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Since it is given that the rod is light, you can ignore W_r. But you are forgetting the vertical reaction at O.
 
Hi Jay, thanks. I will ignore W_r then. How should the vertical reaction at O look like? Should it be another component, or should it be part of F_c?

Thanks.
 
Call it a component O_y, acting vertical, perpendicular to F_c (which you probably should be referring to as O_x instead of F_c).
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top