Tangential and Radial Acceleration problem

AI Thread Summary
The problem involves a locomotive accelerating while rounding a curve, with given tangential and total acceleration values. The total acceleration is calculated using the formula that combines radial and tangential components. The key is to correctly identify that the radial acceleration is not provided and must be derived from the total and tangential accelerations. By rearranging the relationship between these accelerations, the correct speed of the locomotive can be determined. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the relationship between the different types of acceleration in circular motion.
xChrix
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



As a locomotive rounds a circular curve of radius 1.80 km, its speed is increasing at a rate of 0.440 m/s2. An instrument in the cab (an accelerometer) indicates that the magnitude of the locomotive's total acceleration at a particular instant is 0.680 m/s2. What is the locomotive's speed at that instant?

at = 0.440 m/s^2
a = 0.680 m/s^2
r = 1800 m



Homework Equations



a = sqrt(aradial^2 + atangential^2) (1)

ar = -[(v^2)/r] (2)


The Attempt at a Solution



ar = sqrt(0.440^2 + 0.680^2)

ar= 0.80993

0.80993 = -[v^2 divided by 1800 m]

-38.2 But it is showing up in my online assignment that is it wrong :(
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

I think you almost have it.

It's just that you maybe have switched the sense of what the problem tells you.

You have 2 accelerations as you recognized. Tangential acceleration and Centripetal (Radial).

And the magnitude of their relationship taken together is as I think you figured Radial2 + Tangential2 = Total2

So far so good. But in the statement of the problem they tell you the Tangential and they tell you the Total, but not the Radial. That's what you need to figure the Tangential velocity.

Just change the way you figured it.
 
thank you!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top