Tap Water Flow Reduction: Why Does Distance Matter?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explains that the reduction in the cross-section of water flow from a tap as distance increases is due to the acceleration of water as it falls. The mass flow rate remains constant, but the speed increases, causing the cross-section to decrease. Surface tension helps maintain a narrow stream shape rather than allowing it to fall straight down. Participants express appreciation for the insightful answers provided. Overall, the thread highlights the physics behind tap water flow dynamics.
Jayse_83
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Hi,
Please could someone explain why it is that the cross section of water emerging from a tap decreases with tap distance ... is it due to air resistance acting to form some kind of aerodynamic shape? any thoughts would be much appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's simply that the water accelerates as it falls. The rate (mass per second) at which water flows remains the same throughout the stream, but since the speed increases as it falls, the cross-section must decrease. The stream retains a narrow shape (instead of falling straight down like rain) due to surface tension holding things together.
 
wow! great answer, thanks Doc :D
 
Jayse_83 said:
wow! great answer, thanks Doc :D
You want to know what I love best about this place? Too bad; I'm going to tell you anyhow. It's that people like you ask questions that never entered my mind in my entire life until I see them here, and then I want to know the answer as well. And I get one. This whole site rocks! :approve:
 

Thread 'Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology?'

Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
View full post »

Thread 'Derivation of Hamilton's Principle: Questions'

I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
View full post »

Similar threads

Question about lifting water through a water pipe
Replies
4
Views
2K
Measuring Water Flow Pressure: How to Design an Experiment with Faucet Aerators
Replies
1
Views
4K
Why does tap water make sound?
Replies
4
Views
11K
Water Pressure at the tap and practical Bernoulli equation
Replies
10
Views
6K
Formula derivation connecting vertical water flowrate & horizontal distance moved by a suspended sphere
5
Replies
207
Views
9K
Surface Tension - Using hot soapy water to wash clothes
Replies
1
Views
2K
Compression of air entrained in water
Replies
4
Views
2K
I Drag equation - relative flow velocity
Replies
11
Views
3K
I Understanding the thrust generated by a typical jet engine
Replies
2
Views
3K
An odd question regarding Bernoulli's Principle
Replies
5
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top