Tensile Test Results: Adhesion of Tape to Plastic Surface

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the results of tensile tests conducted to evaluate the adhesion of tape to plastic surfaces with and without surface treatment. The untreated plastic surface showed a higher mean maximum load of 29 Newtons, allowing the tape to be pulled 10-20 centimeters before breaking, while the treated surface had a lower mean maximum load of 25 Newtons, with only 5 centimeters of pull before failure. This unexpected result raises questions about the effectiveness of the surface treatment in enhancing adhesion despite the lower load capacity. Participants suggest that different types of adhesion mechanisms, such as penetration and electrostatic adhesion, could influence the outcomes, and emphasize the importance of testing geometry and procedure. Clarifying these aspects may provide insights into why the tape broke during testing.
TensileTest
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
How should I interpret these results?
Hello,

I am currently writing my thesis, where I have to investigate if a surface treatment increases the adhesion (between tape and a plastic surface). For this purpose, I have among other tests, performed a tensile test between the tape and plastic surface. The tensile test can be separated in two:

1)To test the adhesion between tape and plastic surface (when the plastic surface has not been treated).

2) To test the adhesion between tape and plastic surface (when the plastic surface HAS been treated)

My results are:

1) The mean for the maximum load is: 29 Newton. It was possible to pull the tape 10-20 centimeters of the plastic surface, before the tape broke.

2) The mean for the maximum load is: 25 Newton. It was possible to pull the tape 5 centimeters of the plastic surface, before the tape broke.

I think that the test results from ”2” (with surface treatment) indicates that the surface treatment increased the adhesion. But the mean for the maximum load is smaller here. I do not understand. What can I concluded from these results and how can I explain them?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
A diagram or picture of your test method would be helpful in understanding it.
With regard to adhesive qualities, as I understand it, there are two basic types of adhesion, one is penetration of the adhesive into the contacting surface(s), for which a textured surface may be helpful; the other is electrostatic adhesion, for this a smoother surface with more contact area may be better.
 
I would expect the tape to stretch more than the plastic backing. The force then, is that needed to peel or separate the width of the tape, not the contact area of the tape. Speed will be important as energy flow is needed to break the bond as the tape is progressively released.

I would expected the test to be a continuous process. I would like to know why the tape broke.

Maybe you could describe the testing geometry and procedure better.
 
Hi all, i have some questions about the tesla turbine: is a tesla turbine more efficient than a steam engine or a stirling engine ? about the discs of the tesla turbine warping because of the high speed rotations; does running the engine on a lower speed solve that or will the discs warp anyway after time ? what is the difference in efficiency between the tesla turbine running at high speed and running it at a lower speed ( as fast as possible but low enough to not warp de discs) and: i...
Thread 'Where is my curb stop?'
My water meter is submerged under water for about 95% of the year. Today I took a photograph of the inside of my water meter box because today is one of the rare days that my water meter is not submerged in water. Here is the photograph that I took of my water meter with the cover on: Here is a photograph I took of my water meter with the cover off: I edited the photograph to draw a red circle around a knob on my water meter. Is that knob that I drew a red circle around my meter...
Back
Top