Testing water pipes with air pressure

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the testing of threaded steel piping systems for leaks using air pressure instead of water, particularly in contexts where frost issues may arise. Participants explore the implications of using air for testing, the acceptable leak rates, and the safety considerations involved in pressure testing with gases versus liquids.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that the acceptable leak rate during air pressure testing is about 0.5 bars after six hours, while others question the adequacy of this standard.
  • There is a concern regarding the dangers of testing pressure vessels with gas due to the compressive energy stored in air, leading to a preference for a maximum pressure of 1.5 bar during preliminary tests.
  • Participants note that pressure vessels and joints may seal better under liquid pressure, which could affect the integrity assessment when using air.
  • One participant proposes that the bleed rate during testing is influenced by the number of joints and the sealing methods used, suggesting that a consistent number of joints per volume could provide a reliable integrity indication.
  • Another viewpoint emphasizes that air pressure testing is merely a preliminary measure, as slow leaks in extensive piping may take a long time to manifest, whereas liquid testing could reveal issues more rapidly.
  • A participant shares an alternative method involving charging the system with water and using a small air chamber to stabilize pressure, highlighting the importance of managing stored energy safely.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing opinions on the effectiveness and safety of air pressure testing compared to liquid testing, with no consensus reached on the best approach or acceptable leak rates.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge various assumptions, such as the impact of temperature on fluid testing and the specific conditions under which air pressure testing is deemed appropriate. The discussion reflects a range of perspectives on safety and testing methodologies without resolving these complexities.

TSN79
Messages
422
Reaction score
0
Picture a piping system made up of threaded steel pipes. It is to hold regular water at 7-10 bars. When testing the system for leaks, air is used due to a frost issue and the consequences of a larger leak with water. But what holds water doesn't hold air, and so it slowly leaks out. The question is how fast the air should be allowed to leak out before being considered "good enough"? I suppose that is dependent on the number of joints and perhaps what air pressure is applied? Usually we never apply more than 1,5 bar of air pressure during such a test.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
What is the current accepted value?
 
A drop of about 0,5 bars after six hours or so will generally be accepted.
 
Testing pressure vessels or pipes with a gas under pressure is dangerous because of the compressive energy stored in the air. That is probably why a maximum pressure of 1.5 bar is used for the preliminary integrity test. A liquid has much lower stored energy so is safe when testing higher pressures and volumes.

Most pressure vessels and joints are designed to seal better under pressure than without. For that reason it is not only viscosity of the fluid that makes a difference, but may be the increased pressure of the water that better seals the joints.

The bleed rate will be determined by the number of joints being tested and the method / material used to seal those joints. If the number of joints per volume of pipe is reasonably fixed then the pressure lapse rate will be a good indication of integrity, independent of the size of the network being tested.

Do you ever brush a soap solution onto the joints to find the air leaks? That might be quicker than a long pressure test.
 
IMO pressure testing with air is nothing more than a preliminary test. A slow leak on extensive piping will take a long long time to show up as an indicated pressure drop. Fill this piping with liquid and pressurize and the pressure may drop in a matter of seconds or a minute. Naturally it is advisable to test with air first in case there was a completely forgotten connection or something of this nature. After all, who wants to make a mess with liquid spilling?
 
I have worked in similar testing types for liquid systems. A more conventional approach (I do understand that if temperature is dangerous to the fluid we need to reconsider). Charge the system with water, this is important due to the stored energy issue. Than attach a small test rig that has a air chamber similar to a "reverse" head tank. This allows a small buffer and a place to stabilize the pressure due to pump variations. At this point feel free to use your established criteria and still feel good about a controlled predictable amount of stored energy.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
11K
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K