The Earth's magnetic field is essentially that of a magnetic dipole....

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the Earth's magnetic field at a height of 13,000 km above the North Pole, using the properties of a magnetic dipole. The original poster references specific equations related to magnetic fields and expresses uncertainty about the variables involved.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply a formula for the magnetic field of a dipole but questions the meaning of the variables "x" and "R" in the context of Earth. Some participants seek clarification on the source of the equations and their validity, noting potential issues with the interpretation of the variables.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively discussing the definitions and constraints of the equations presented. There is a focus on understanding the relationship between the variables and the physical setup of the problem. Some guidance has been offered regarding the interpretation of the dipole field and its parameters.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted ambiguity regarding the assumptions made about the dipole's location and the relationship between the variables in the equations. The discussion reflects the need for clarity on these points to proceed effectively.

hitemup
Messages
81
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



The Earth's magnetic field is essentially that of a magnetic dipole. If the field near the North Pole is about 10^-4 T, what will it be (approximately) 13,000 km above the surface at the North Pole?

Homework Equations



B = \frac{\mu _0}{2\pi}\frac{\mu}{(R^2+x^2)^{3/2}}

for x >> R

B = \frac{\mu _0}{2\pi}\frac{\mu}{x^3}

The Attempt at a Solution



I know how to find the magnetic field of a dipole on its axis for a circle. My textbook uses the second formula to solve this problem. But I cannot understand what "x" and "R" are for the earth, and how we assumed x>>R.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Wherever you got that equation from (link?), it should state what the variables mean and what constraints there are on its validity. If you can't provide a link, please quote them.
The form of it (##R^2+x^2##), suggests R and x are orthogonal, which doesn't sound right for the given question.
 
haruspex said:
Wherever you got that equation from (link?), it should state what the variables mean and what constraints there are on its validity. If you can't provide a link, please quote them.
The form of it (##R^2+x^2##), suggests R and x are orthogonal, which doesn't sound right for the given question.

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/magnetic/curloo.html#c3

This is the same formula except pi*r^2*I is changed with mu(magnetic dipole moment) in mine.
 
"Dipole field" is the name for the field from a current loop in the limit ##R\rightarrow 0##, with m or ##{\bf \mu} = \pi R^2 \;I## constant. So Haru is right and your book is right too.

That eliminates the R question. Now you should think about where this dipole could possibly be located, and therefore what to take for the x.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
923
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K