The Earth's magnetic field is essentially that of a magnetic dipole....

AI Thread Summary
The Earth's magnetic field behaves like a magnetic dipole, with a strength of approximately 10^-4 T near the North Pole. To calculate the magnetic field at 13,000 km above the surface, the relevant equations involve the magnetic dipole moment and the distances from the dipole. The variables "R" and "x" in the equations represent the radius of the dipole and the distance from the dipole, respectively, with the assumption that x is much greater than R for simplification. Clarification on the orthogonality of R and x is necessary, as it impacts the interpretation of the equations. Understanding the dipole's location is crucial for accurately determining the value of x in this context.
hitemup
Messages
81
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



The Earth's magnetic field is essentially that of a magnetic dipole. If the field near the North Pole is about 10^-4 T, what will it be (approximately) 13,000 km above the surface at the North Pole?

Homework Equations



B = \frac{\mu _0}{2\pi}\frac{\mu}{(R^2+x^2)^{3/2}}

for x >> R

B = \frac{\mu _0}{2\pi}\frac{\mu}{x^3}

The Attempt at a Solution



I know how to find the magnetic field of a dipole on its axis for a circle. My textbook uses the second formula to solve this problem. But I cannot understand what "x" and "R" are for the earth, and how we assumed x>>R.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Wherever you got that equation from (link?), it should state what the variables mean and what constraints there are on its validity. If you can't provide a link, please quote them.
The form of it (##R^2+x^2##), suggests R and x are orthogonal, which doesn't sound right for the given question.
 
haruspex said:
Wherever you got that equation from (link?), it should state what the variables mean and what constraints there are on its validity. If you can't provide a link, please quote them.
The form of it (##R^2+x^2##), suggests R and x are orthogonal, which doesn't sound right for the given question.

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/magnetic/curloo.html#c3

This is the same formula except pi*r^2*I is changed with mu(magnetic dipole moment) in mine.
 
"Dipole field" is the name for the field from a current loop in the limit ##R\rightarrow 0##, with m or ##{\bf \mu} = \pi R^2 \;I## constant. So Haru is right and your book is right too.

That eliminates the R question. Now you should think about where this dipole could possibly be located, and therefore what to take for the x.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top