The electric field at a midpoint of two charges

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field at a midpoint between two charges, -8.64 µC and 6.97 µC, separated by 7.63 cm. The user initially calculated the electric fields from each charge but arrived at an incorrect total due to misinterpreting the direction of the fields. It was clarified that the electric field from the positive charge points away from it, while the field from the negative charge points towards it, necessitating a correct addition of their magnitudes. After correcting the midpoint distance and ensuring the proper signs for the electric fields, the user successfully obtained the correct answer. The importance of accurately considering the direction of electric fields in such calculations is emphasized.
marrone
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Problem 1:

Homework Statement


What is the electric field at a point midway between a -8.64uC and 6.97uC charge 7.63 cm apart? Take the direction towards the positive charge to be positive and assume no other charges nearby.


Homework Equations



E=kQ/r2

The Attempt at a Solution



So what I've been doing is finding the strengths of the electric fields for each charge at the midpoint, which is .03185 m, and then adding them together.

e.g. E1=k(6.97*10-6)/(.031852)

E2=k(-8.64*10-6)/(.031852)

I get -1.48*107, when the answer ought to be -9.56*107

What am I doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I haven't checked your numbers thoroughly, but:

Have you thought carefully about the direction the field from each charge should point?

Also, try again on 7.63/2 cm = ____ m?
 
I think the problem is how you add the numbers together. Since the test charge placed in middle is positive, the negative charge will try to attract it and and positive charge will repel it. When you add the two values of E together as you did, you are cancelling the effect of the negative charge with the positive charge, which is not true as both E1 and E2 makes the test charge go more to the negative charge. So simply, make E2 value negative and add to E1.
 
Well, what I had been doing is making E2 negative and adding it to a positive E1, but thinking about what redbelly said, a field will always point from positive to negative, which is in a negative direction. So I made both of them negative and added them together, and I got the right answer.

Oh, and thanks for checking the value of the midpoint. I didn't see I had mixed up the digits after the decimal point.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top