The Kepler Orbits (algebra manipulation)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on rewriting the Kepler orbit equation r(φ) = c/(1 + ε cos(φ)) in rectangular coordinates (x, y) to demonstrate that it represents an ellipse. The participant attempts to simplify the equation using the provided forms in equations 8.51 and 8.52, ultimately arriving at x² + y² = c² + ε²x² - 2xcε. They confirm that the left side is correct as it equals r² but struggle to manipulate the right side into the desired ellipse form. The conversation emphasizes algebraic manipulation techniques and the verification of constants a, b, and d from the ellipse equations. The goal is to successfully express the Kepler orbit in the standard ellipse format.
aaj92
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



We have proved that any Kepler orbit can be written in the form of r(\phi) = \frac{c}{1+\epsilon*cos(\phi)} where c>0 \epsilon\geq 0. for the case that 0 \leq \epsilon < 1, rewrite this equation in rectangular coordinates (x,y) and prove that the equation can be cast in the form 8.51 which is the equation of an ellipse. Verify the values of the constants given in 8.52

Homework Equations



8.51: 1 = \frac{(x+d)^{2}}{a^{2}} + \frac{y^{2}}{b^{2}}

8.52: a = \frac{c}{1-\epsilon^{2}} ; b = \frac{c}{\sqrt{1-\epsilon^{2}}} ; d = a\epsilon or d = \frac{c\epsilon}{1-\epsilon^{2}}

The Attempt at a Solution



i plugged in equation 8.52 into 8.51 and started simplifying stuff... I ended up with x^{2}+y^{2} = c^{2} + \epsilon^{2}x^{2} - 2xc\epsilon

i know the left hand side is correct because it equals r^{2}. So i know i have to eventually take the square root of each side, however, I have no idea how to get the right hand side of my equation to look like the right hand side of the equation listed in the problem.

any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i just simplified it down more so that

\sqrt{x^{2}+y^{2}} = c - \epsilonx

because the right hand side was a perfect square and could be made into (c-\epsilonx)^{2}
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top