The Lagrangian Solution of an LC Circuit

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving an LC circuit using the Lagrangian formulation, where charge q is treated as the generalized coordinate. The inductor's energy is classified as kinetic energy due to its similarity to the kinetic energy term, while the capacitor's energy is considered potential energy. The total energy is represented by the Hamiltonian, and the difference between the two energy types defines the Lagrangian. It is emphasized that while capacitors can store energy, inductors only temporarily store energy in a magnetic field when in motion. The classification of energy types in this context is debated but ultimately does not affect the overall analysis.
nmbr28albert
Messages
13
Reaction score
3
One way to solve the simple LC circuit with 1 inductor and 1 capacitor is to use the Lagrangian formulation of mechanics and consider charge q as the generalized coordinate. When writing down your Lagrangian, the energy of the inductor \frac{1}{2}L(\frac{dq}{dt})^2 is treated as the kinetic energy, and the energy of the capacitor \frac{q^2}{2C} is treated as the potential. My first instinct is to treat the inductor energy as also potential energy. Why is it considered kinetic?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Because it is similar to the kinetic energy i.e the term (dq/dt)^2 is similar to v^2. The definition of velocity v in lagrangian mechanics is the first derivative wrt time, of the generalized coordinate right?
 
I don't think it matters which you call what.

You have two terms. The sum is the Hamiltonian (total energy) and the difference is the Lagrangian. The sign of the difference shouldn't make any difference.

When you have three or more terms, you need to be more careful with signs.
 
that sounds right

on linear motion along coordinate x, velocity is dx/dt, i.e., the first derivattive. Kinetic energy is (1/2)mv^2 or one half of constant m times the square of the first derivative of the generalized coordinate.

Besides, capacitors can actually store energy and inductors cannot, at least not permanently, only temporarily in the magnetic field but things need to be in motion (changing).

my 2 cents
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
Back
Top