The polarization charge density ##\rho##p in a charged dialectric

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the polarization charge density in a dielectric cube containing a region with evenly distributed electrons. It clarifies that outside the cube, the polarization vector is zero, while inside the non-charged part, it is defined as ##\vec{P} = \epsilon_0 \chi_e \vec{E}_{tot}##. The key question arises regarding the polarization in the charged region, with uncertainty about the total electric field ##\vec{E}_{tot}## and its dependence on the charge distribution. Participants seek clarification on the geometry of the charged region and the meaning of the "total" electric field. The conversation highlights the need for a clearer understanding of the problem's parameters and their implications for calculating polarization.
happyparticle
Messages
490
Reaction score
24
Homework Statement
The polarization charge density ##\rho##p in a charged dialectric
Relevant Equations
##\rho p = - \nabla\cdot \vec{P}##
##\vec{P} = \epsilon_0 \chi_e \vec{E}##
Hi,

I have a dialectric cube and inside the center of the cube I have a part where we have Introduced evenly electrons.

I have to find the polarization charge density in the 3 regions.
I know outside the cube is the vacuum, thus ##\vec{P} = 0## and inside the dialectric (non charged part) ##\vec{P} = \epsilon_0 \chi_e \vec{E}_{tot}##

However, in the charged part of the dialectric is it ##\vec{P} = \epsilon_0 \chi_e \vec{E}_{tot}## ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
EpselonZero said:
I have a dialectric cube and inside the center of the cube I have a part where we have Introduced evenly electrons.
What does this "part" inside the cube look like? Is it a finite volume like a smaller cube, or a sphere or what? Where are its boundaries?

Maybe you can write down that inside the dielectric is ##\vec{P} = \epsilon_0 \chi_e \vec{E}_{tot}## in principle, but you don't know ##\vec{E}_{tot}##. You need to find that in terms of the amount of charge at the center of the cube.

What does the subscript ##tot## for the electric field mean anyway? Is it a total of some kind? What is being added to get it? I think you mean the field as a function of position ##\vec E(\vec r)##.

How does this problem differ from the one you posted here
bound-charges-of-a-block-top-and-bottom-surface.1011665
other than it is more vague?
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top