The polarization charge density ##\rho##p in a charged dialectric

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the polarization charge density in a dielectric cube containing a region with evenly distributed electrons. It clarifies that outside the cube, the polarization vector is zero, while inside the non-charged part, it is defined as ##\vec{P} = \epsilon_0 \chi_e \vec{E}_{tot}##. The key question arises regarding the polarization in the charged region, with uncertainty about the total electric field ##\vec{E}_{tot}## and its dependence on the charge distribution. Participants seek clarification on the geometry of the charged region and the meaning of the "total" electric field. The conversation highlights the need for a clearer understanding of the problem's parameters and their implications for calculating polarization.
happyparticle
Messages
490
Reaction score
24
Homework Statement
The polarization charge density ##\rho##p in a charged dialectric
Relevant Equations
##\rho p = - \nabla\cdot \vec{P}##
##\vec{P} = \epsilon_0 \chi_e \vec{E}##
Hi,

I have a dialectric cube and inside the center of the cube I have a part where we have Introduced evenly electrons.

I have to find the polarization charge density in the 3 regions.
I know outside the cube is the vacuum, thus ##\vec{P} = 0## and inside the dialectric (non charged part) ##\vec{P} = \epsilon_0 \chi_e \vec{E}_{tot}##

However, in the charged part of the dialectric is it ##\vec{P} = \epsilon_0 \chi_e \vec{E}_{tot}## ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
EpselonZero said:
I have a dialectric cube and inside the center of the cube I have a part where we have Introduced evenly electrons.
What does this "part" inside the cube look like? Is it a finite volume like a smaller cube, or a sphere or what? Where are its boundaries?

Maybe you can write down that inside the dielectric is ##\vec{P} = \epsilon_0 \chi_e \vec{E}_{tot}## in principle, but you don't know ##\vec{E}_{tot}##. You need to find that in terms of the amount of charge at the center of the cube.

What does the subscript ##tot## for the electric field mean anyway? Is it a total of some kind? What is being added to get it? I think you mean the field as a function of position ##\vec E(\vec r)##.

How does this problem differ from the one you posted here
bound-charges-of-a-block-top-and-bottom-surface.1011665
other than it is more vague?
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'
Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up ##Mg \sin \theta ## will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards ## \mu Mg \cos \theta ## Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...
Back
Top