The rays of my ray diagram are not lining up

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a ray diagram for a mirror where the rays are not aligning as expected, despite following the correct reflection rules. The user programmed a computer to draw the diagram and believes the rays are accurate. The calculations are based on the mirror formula and magnification equations. A key point raised is the issue of spherical aberration, which affects the alignment of rays in spherical mirrors. The conversation highlights the importance of using parabolic mirrors in high-quality telescopes to mitigate this problem.
jeremy5561
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I am given the object distance and height, and the focal length of the mirror and I must draw the ray diagram.
Although this was drawn by a computer program that I programmed, I thought it would be more relevant in this forum, because I believe that the rays are correctly drawn and the program is not at question.


Homework Equations


The image you see on the screen (blue arrow) is calculated using the math equations:
1/f=1/do+1/di
hi/ho=-di/do


The Attempt at a Solution


The ray diagram was drawn following the three rules
  1. A ray perpendicular to the principal axis will reflect thorough the focal point.
  2. A ray that passes through the focal point will reflect perpendicular to the principal axis.
  3. A ray that passes through the centre of curvature will reflect back thorough the centre of curvature.
This ray diagram seems to follow all three rules perfectly, yet the rays do not line up on the object. What did I do wrong?

http://coldwartimeline.tk/raydiagram.bmp
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have just discovered the effects of spherical aberration (look it up!).

This is why high quality Newtonian reflecting telescopes, for example, will utilize a parabolic mirror rather than a spherical one.
 
Ahh... thank you.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top