Theoretical/non-tedious question about Frobenius method

  • Thread starter Thread starter s3a
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Frobenius Method
s3a
Messages
814
Reaction score
8
When using the Frobenius method of solving differential equations using power series solutions, I get a solution

y = (indicial_stuff) + (infinite_summation_stuff) = 0

for a differential equation differential_stuff = 0.

WHY is it that I can say

(indicial_stuff) = 0?

If

y = (indicial_stuff) * (infinite_summation_stuff) = 0

(NOTICE THE MULTIPLICATION INSTEAD OF ADDITION) then it would make sense to me that

(indicial_stuff) = 0

but with the addition, I cannot make sense of this.

I tried to generalize this question and hope that I haven't made it more confusing but, if I have made the question confusing, please tell me and I will clear things up as best as I can.

Basically, I'm just asking for the reason why this – the isolation of the indicial polynomial equation (and the other summation portion) - is justified.

Any input would be greatly appreciated!
Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The answer to my question was: "by equating coefficients."
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top