Thermal Expansion of Cube and Sphere

AI Thread Summary
When comparing the thermal expansion of a solid sphere and a solid cube made from the same material, the cube experiences a greater change in volume when both are heated to the same temperature. The initial volume of the sphere is less than that of the cube, which affects the volume change according to the equation for volume expansion. Initially, there was confusion regarding the initial volumes of the two shapes, but it was clarified that the sphere fits within the cube, confirming its smaller volume. A conceptual approach of viewing the two objects as part of a homogeneous mass simplifies the understanding of their expansion. Ultimately, the cube's greater initial volume leads to a larger overall change in volume upon heating.
frostchaos123
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A solid sphere and a solid cube are made from the same material. The sphere would just fit within the cube, if it could. Both begin at the same temperature, and both are heated to the same temperature. Which object, if either, has the greatest change in volume?

The answer is the cube.


The Attempt at a Solution



Using the equation for volume expansion, change in V=beta*Vi*change in temperature, shouldn't a higher initial volume give raise to a greater change in volume, therefore the sphere expands more?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Reasoning seem right to me, except if the sphere fits in the cube does the sphere have the higher initial volume?
 
Oops you are right the sphere should have a lesser initial volume, i was assuming that the sphere was bigger than the cube.

Thanks.
 
Also (I thought afterwards) the answer is a bit more obvious if we don't think of two separate solids. Think of a homogeneous curve of matter. Inside it not physically separate but just delimited in the mind is a sphere touching the cube at 6 points. The whole thing expands. Then you don't have to think so hard to imagine what happens.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top