Thermal expansion of steel pipe

AI Thread Summary
When a 40,000 km long steel pipe encircling the Earth's equator is heated by 1 degree Celsius, it expands, causing it to no longer fit snugly. The calculated expansion results in the pipe standing approximately 0.07 km off the ground. This is derived from the formula for thermal expansion, where the change in length is proportional to the original length and the temperature change. A more precise calculation suggests a height of about 0.06369 km, indicating that rounding errors can affect the outcome. Accurate calculations require using more decimal places to minimize errors.
rwh
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
The equatorial radius of the Earth is about 6370km. Consider a 40,000 km long steel pipe that forms a giant ring that fits snugly around the equator of the earth. Suppose the temp. of the pipe is increases 1 degree C. The pipe gets longer. it is also no longer snug. How high does the pipe stand off the ground?

Assume that D L = L o x 1/100,000 x D T

. I came up with .07 km. The radius of the pipe is actually 6369.42 km. When the temperature of the pipe is increased 1 degree Celsius it will expand .4 km making the pipe 40000.4 km. 40000.4 / 3.14 = 12738.98. 12738.98 / 2 = 6369.49 (radius) 6369.49- 6369.42 is .07km.

Am I right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
yes, I believe so
 
Simpler yet ... (with DT = 1)

\Delta L = \Delta 2 \pi R = 2 \pi \Delta R = \frac{L_o}{ 100,000} = \frac {2 \pi R}{100,000}

Canceling 2pi on both sides :

\Delta R = \frac {R}{100,000} = 0.06369 ~km

Your number is a little high because of round off error. If your first significant digit is in the second decimal place, you want to calculate with numbers written up to at least 3 decimal places.
 
Thank you!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top