Thermodynamic identity (non-quasistatic?)

jdstokes
Messages
520
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



A cylinder contains one liter of air at room termperature and atmospheric pressure. At one end of the cylinder is a massless piston, whose surface area is 0.01 m^2. Suppose that you push the piston _very_ suddenly, exerting a force of 2 kN. The piston moves only one millimeter, before it is stopped by an immovable barrier of some sort.

Use the thermodynamic identity to calculate the change in the entropy of the gas (once it has again reached equilibrium)

Homework Equations



dU = TdS - PdV

The Attempt at a Solution



Very sudden processes can be assumed adiabatic. The pressure at the beginning and the end is atmospheric, therefore rearranging the thermodynamic identity gives

dS = \frac{-P_\mathrm{atm}A d\ell + dQ}{T} = 0.003 \mathrm{J/K}.

My concern here is that since the process is non-quasistatic, that the thermodynamic identity does not hold.

Is it possible to apply the thermodynamic identity to processes which begin and end in equilibrium, but are non-quasistatic in between?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Any thoughts on this one?
 
All the variables in your problem are state variables - so you can, in fact, use the thermodynamic relation. Even if you do not know along what path the system changed state, but you can always relate the final and initial states.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top