Thevenin Voltage & Impedance with Dependent Source: Homework & Solution"

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating Thevenin voltage and impedance in a circuit with a dependent source. Participants suggest using nodal analysis to find the voltage across a 300-ohm resistor, which represents Vth. There is a debate about the correct nodal equation and the handling of supernodes, with advice to consider mesh analysis as an alternative approach. The conversation also touches on the importance of accurately calculating complex voltages due to circuit components like capacitors. Ultimately, participants confirm the correct approach to find Zth by using the short circuit current method and adjusting the circuit accordingly.
eehelp150
Messages
235
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Nad7XaN.png


Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



How do I do Thevenin voltage and impedance with a dependent source? Any hints would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You just did a network with a dependent source using nodal analysis. Solve for the voltage across the 300 ohm resistor in this network; that will be Vth.
 
The Electrician said:
You just did a network with a dependent source using nodal analysis. Solve for the voltage across the 300 ohm resistor in this network; that will be Vth.
At the "right side" of node V, is it (V+2V)/300 or (V-2V)/300?
Would the nodal equation be:
(V-9)/600 + V/(-j300) + (V+2V)/300 = 0?
 
The thing is, you have a supernode here if you're going to do nodal analysis.

See how they have two mesh currents, I1 and I2 shown? I would take that as an invitation to use mesh analysis.
 
I see some of your posts changing, but there is no indication of editing. I think you may be deleting a post and then reposting. Don't do that; use the edit function.

When you delete and then repost it can be very confusing.

Do you know how to deal with a supernode? If you don't, perhaps you should do a mesh analysis first.
 
eehelp150 said:
At the "right side" of node V, is it (V+2V)/300 or (V-2V)/300?
Would the nodal equation be:
(V-9)/600 + V/(-j300) + (V+2V)/300 = 0?

That equation is correct, but you need the voltage on the right side of the dependent source--that will be Vth.
 
The Electrician said:
That equation is correct, but you need the voltage on the right side of the dependent source--that will be Vth.
No worries. That would just be 3V. Solve for V and multiply by 3 :smile:
 
gneill said:
No worries. That would just be 3V. Solve for V and multiply by 3 :smile:
Solving for V in that equation, I get V = 9/5 Volts. Is that correct? What would V300ohm be?
 
eehelp150 said:
Solving for V in that equation, I get V = 9/5 Volts. Is that correct? What would V300ohm be?

No, the voltage should be complex thanks to the capacitor in the circuit.
 
  • #10
gneill said:
No, the voltage should be complex thanks to the capacitor in the circuit.
Interesting. I "re-pressed" the solve button on Wolfram alpha and got:
V = (63-18i)/53.
 
  • #11
eehelp150 said:
Interesting. I "re-pressed" the solve button on Wolfram alpha and got:
V = (63-18i)/53.
And that would be a much better result!
 
  • #12
gneill said:
And that would be a much better result!
So now I have the voltage across the capacitor and the value of the dependent source (which is simply 2*Vcapacitor). The voltage across the 300ohm resistor is Voc which would be: (Vcapacitor + 2Vcapacitor) for a total of 3 * Vcapacitor right?
 
  • #13
eehelp150 said:
So now I have the voltage across the capacitor and the value of the dependent source (which is simply 2*Vcapacitor). The voltage across the 300ohm resistor is Voc which would be: (Vcapacitor + 2Vcapacitor) for a total of 3 * Vcapacitor right?
Right.
 
  • #14
gneill said:
Right.
How would I find Zth?
 
  • #15
eehelp150 said:
How would I find Zth?
One method is to find the short circuit current across the output (i.e. the Norton equivalent current). The impedance is the ratio of the Thevenin voltage to the Norton current.
 
  • #16
Replace the 9 volt with a short and add a 1 amp current source at the output. Solve the network for V again. The voltage at the A-B terminals will be 3*V. The value of that voltage will be equal to the resistance at the A-B terminals which will be the desired Rth.

Since you already have an equation for V due to the 9 volt source, it will be a small change to add the 1 amp current source.
 
  • #17
The Electrician said:
Replace the 9 volt with a short and add a 1 amp current source at the output. Solve the network for V again. The voltage at the A-B terminals will be 3*V. The value of that voltage will be equal to the resistance at the A-B terminals which will be the desired Rth.

Since you already have an equation for V due to the 9 volt source, it will be a small change to add the 1 amp current source.
I ended up getting I1 = -0.10975609756098 +0.01219512195122i
and I2 = -0.13414634146341 -0.20731707317073i

Did I do it right?
3*V = 197.56 -21.95i

V300ohm = (I2+1)*300 = 259.756-62.19i

Which value is right?
 
  • #18
Neither is right. Let's see the equation you used.

Your original equations was (V-9)/600 + V/(-j300) + (V+2V)/300 = 0

What would it be if you short the 9 volt source and apply 1 amp to the A-B terminals?
 
  • #19
The Electrician said:
Neither is right. Let's see the equation you used.

Your original equations was (V-9)/600 + V/(-j300) + (V+2V)/300 = 0

What would it be if you short the 9 volt source and apply 1 amp to the A-B terminals?
V/600 + V/(-j300) + 3V/300 - 1 =0
 
  • #20
So is this the equation that gave you the values in post #17? If so, something's wrong with the solution because that's the right equation. Did you use MyAlgebra to solve it?

Here's what I get:

Solu.png
 
  • #21
The Electrician said:
So is this the equation that gave you the values in post #17? If so, something's wrong with the solution because that's the right equation. Did you use MyAlgebra to solve it?

Here's what I get:

View attachment 107413
redid with wolfram and got it. Thanks!
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
42
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top