Where Did the Mysterious '6' Come From in F24 Calculation?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the derivation of the force equation F24 = 6kq^2/L^2 in a physics problem. Participants clarify that the factor of 6 arises from multiplying the 2 from the r^2 calculation with the 3 from the charge interactions. The forces from charges q1 and q4 are noted to cancel each other out, while the forces from q1, q2, and q3 contribute to the net force acting on charge q4. This results in F24 being the only force affecting q4, leading to the final expression. Understanding these interactions is crucial for grasping the overall force dynamics in the scenario.
Gemy4
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Hi first post sorry if I didn't follow anyone specific rule. Me and my fiancee are stumped how my physics 2b teacher got 6kq^2/L^2 for F24. We understand that where r= L square root2/2 is squared so the result is L^2. But where in the heck did the 6 come from in 6kq^2.
 

Attachments

  • GetAttachment.aspx.jpg
    GetAttachment.aspx.jpg
    25.8 KB · Views: 450
Physics news on Phys.org
(L\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2})^2=\frac{2L^2}{4}=L^2/2

ehild
 
Yes. As ehild said in his post, the result of r^2 is (L^2)/2. So the 2 multiplies into the 3 on 3q and it becomes 6q^2 (pardon me for my lack of Tex).
 
Beautiful! Also why is it that she used q1 and q4 vs. q3 and q4. I realize it will produce the same answer.
 
Your teacher indicated q1-q4 and q3-q4 because they are two forces of the same magnitude/size pulling in opposite directions. Because these two forces are pulling in opposite directions, their net force cancel to 0.
However, your teacher also killed two birds with one stone because her equations following F14 = F34 not only indicated that the two forces canceled out, it also calculated F24 (as each of the three charges, q1,q2,q3 , provide the same force in different directions). Since F24 does not have any other force cancelling it out, it provides the only force that moves the q4 charge. And that force is 6kq^2/L^2, as you've indicated in your first post.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top