Time evolution of temperature help

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a differential equation related to the cooling of thermal energy, expressed as the rate of change of thermal energy equating to radiative output. The equation leads to a time evolution formula for temperature, T(t), which is derived from the initial temperature T(0) and involves constants like M, R, and the Stefan-Boltzmann constant. Participants share their struggles with rearranging and integrating the equation, particularly in separating variables and simplifying the terms. A key step discussed involves manipulating the equation to express T in terms of T0 and time, leading to a clearer understanding of the temperature's behavior over time. The conversation concludes with a sense of resolution as participants clarify the steps involved in the derivation.
fasterthanjoao
Messages
730
Reaction score
1
First year astronomy question, goes as follows:

"A closely exact description of the cooling described above is to consider the differential equation which says that rate of charge of thermal energy equals the rate of radiative
output. That is:

\frac{d}{dt} \frac{\left(3MkT\right)}{m_p} = -4*pi*R²*T^4 -eqtn1

where M, R are constant. Show that the resulting time evolution of the temperature is then given by:

T(t)```````````````1
--- = ---------------
T(0) ``` (1+3t/t_cool)^(1/3)

(kept getting problems in my latex for that part, so i just typed it out..., i'd like to get this question sorted before i have to go to math)

anyway, its also said that:

````````````3Mk
t_cool = -----------
``````````4*pi*R²*T³*sigma

everything has its usual meaning, sigma is the Stefan-Boltzmann constant, k is the Boltzmann constant.

------------

i'm not really that sure what to do, I tried rearranging eqtn one after taking dT/dt out, "multiplying" each side by dt then integrating. after that, I'm really not much closer to the point. any guides on where to go appreciated. thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't see the problem. This equation is separable:

\frac{dT}{T^4}=\frac{-4\pi m_pR^2\sigma}{3Mk}dt
 
yeah i see that, I've tried to take it some steps further but I'm getting in a bit of a mess. could you try the next step or two, not sure what it is I'm having the problem with.
 
\frac{1}{3}(T_0^{-3}-T^{-3})=\frac{-4\pi m_pR^2\sigma t}{3Mk}

T^{-3}=T_0^{-3}+\frac{4\pi m_pR^2\sigma t}{Mk}

\frac{T_0^3}{T^3}=1+\frac{4\pi m_pR^2T_0^3\sigma t}{Mk}

That help?
 
Last edited:
very much so. thanks. glad to lay that to rest
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top