Time Period of a Small Oscillation

In summary: Homework Statement [/B]A heavy mass ##m## is suspended from two identical steel wires of length ##l##, radius ##r## and Young's modulus ##Y##, as shown in the figure above. When the mass is pulled down by a distance ##x## ##(x<<l)## and released, it undergoes elastic oscillations in the vertical direction.What is the time period?Homework EquationsEquation of motion of a harmonic oscillator$$m\frac {d^2 x} {dt^2} = -kx$$where, ##k## is the spring constant.Young's modulus of a wire of length ##l##, radius ##r## is$$Y
  • #1
VSayantan
59
4

Homework Statement


Untitled.png

[/B]A heavy mass ##m## is suspended from two identical steel wires of length ##l##, radius ##r## and Young's modulus ##Y##, as shown in the figure above. When the mass is pulled down by a distance ##x## ##(x<<l)## and released, it undergoes elastic oscillations in the vertical direction.
What is the time period?

Homework Equations


Equation of motion of a harmonic oscillator
$$m\frac {d^2 x} {dt^2} = -kx$$
where, ##k## is the spring constant.

Young's modulus of a wire of length ##l##, radius ##r## is
$$Y = \frac {FA} {l \cdot \Delta l}$$

Time period
$$T = \frac {2\pi} {\omega}$$

The Attempt at a Solution


Untitled2.png
[/B]
The vertical components of tension cancel out, while the horizontal components add.
At equilibrium
$$k \cdot l \cdot cos {\frac a 2} = mg$$

With the given small displacement ##x<<l##
$$F=k[l \cdot cos {\frac a 2} + x] -mg$$
$$\Rightarrow m \frac {d^2 x} {dt^2} = -kx$$
$$\Rightarrow \frac {d^2 x} {dt^2} = -\omega^2 x$$

Where ##\omega = \frac k m = \frac {mg} {m \cdot l \cdot cos {\frac a 2}} =\sqrt {\frac {g} {l \cdot cos {\frac a 2}}}##

So time period
$$T = \frac {2\pi} {\sqrt {\frac {g} {l \cdot cos {\frac a 2}}}} = 2\pi \sqrt {\frac {l \cdot cos {\frac a 2}} {g}}$$

But, I cannot use the expression for the Young's modulus. What am I missing?
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    1.8 KB · Views: 1,888
  • Untitled2.png
    Untitled2.png
    4 KB · Views: 1,963
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
You have assumed the steel wires have zero tension when they have length zero ...

Also, even if that was the case you could not simply assume that the restoring force has the same spring coefficient k.
 
  • Like
Likes VSayantan
  • #3
Orodruin said:
You have assumed the steel wires have zero tension when they have length zero ...

Also, even if that was the case you could not simply assume that the restoring force has the same spring coefficient k.

So, if the tension on the wires is ##T## (assuming both of them to be equal, and of course ##T\neq0##, as you pointed out), the first equation modifies to $$k \cdot l \cdot cos {\frac a 2}=mg + 2\cdot T \cdot cos {\frac a 2}$$
right?

Then how will I get the equation of motion?
 
  • #4
You have to find the restoring force for a given displacement and use Newton’s second law.
 
  • Like
Likes VSayantan
  • #5
Also. Not right. You still have some weird kl hanging around your equation. What are you imagining as giving rise to this term and why did you place the tension term on the RHS?
 
  • Like
Likes VSayantan
  • #6
VSayantan said:

Homework Statement


View attachment 215364
[/B]A heavy mass ##m## is suspended from two identical steel wires of length ##l##, radius ##r## and Young's modulus ##Y##, as shown in the figure above. When the mass is pulled down by a distance ##x## ##(x<<l)## and released, it undergoes elastic oscillations in the vertical direction.
What is the time period?

Homework Equations


Equation of motion of a harmonic oscillator
$$m\frac {d^2 x} {dt^2} = -kx$$
where, ##k## is the spring constant.

Young's modulus of a wire of length ##l##, radius ##r## is
$$Y = \frac {FA} {l \cdot \Delta l}$$

Time period
$$T = \frac {2\pi} {\omega}$$

The Attempt at a Solution


View attachment 215367[/B]
The vertical components of tension cancel out, while the horizontal components add.
At equilibrium
$$k \cdot l \cdot cos {\frac a 2} = mg$$

With the given small displacement ##x<<l##
$$F=k[l \cdot cos {\frac a 2} + x] -mg$$
$$\Rightarrow m \frac {d^2 x} {dt^2} = -kx$$
$$\Rightarrow \frac {d^2 x} {dt^2} = -\omega^2 x$$

Where ##\omega = \frac k m = \frac {mg} {m \cdot l \cdot cos {\frac a 2}} =\sqrt {\frac {g} {l \cdot cos {\frac a 2}}}##

So time period
$$T = \frac {2\pi} {\sqrt {\frac {g} {l \cdot cos {\frac a 2}}}} = 2\pi \sqrt {\frac {l \cdot cos {\frac a 2}} {g}}$$

But, I cannot use the expression for the Young's modulus. What am I missing?
VSayantan said:
So, if the tension on the wires is ##T## (assuming both of them to be equal, and of course ##T\neq0##, as you pointed out), the first equation modifies to $$k \cdot l \cdot cos {\frac a 2}=mg + 2\cdot T \cdot cos {\frac a 2}$$
right?

Then how will I get the equation of motion?
Calculate tension in terms of Y,A,L and x.
 
  • Like
Likes VSayantan
  • #7
Orodruin said:
Also. Not right. You still have some weird kl hanging around your equation. What are you imagining as giving rise to this term and why did you place the tension term on the RHS?

I'm not sure how to obtain the expression for tension ##T##!
Is it, $$T\cdot cos {\frac a 2}=mgx$$?
But it seems that the ##cosine## component of ##T## gets added downward.

Then how will I obtain ##k##?
 
  • #8
Abhishek kumar said:
Calculate tension in terms of Y,A,L and x.

$$Y=\frac {FL} {A\Delta L}$$

Here, ##\Delta L=x##, ##F=T##
So, $$Y = \frac {FL} {Ax}$$

$$\Rightarrow T= \frac {YAx} {L}$$

Did I get the expression for ##F## correct?
 
  • #9
VSayantan said:
$$Y=\frac {FL} {A\Delta L}$$

Here, ##\Delta L=x##, ##F=T##
So, $$Y = \frac {FL} {Ax}$$

$$\Rightarrow T= \frac {YAx} {L}$$

Did I get the expression for ##F## correct?
When system displaced by x then what is elongation in steel rod?
 
  • #10
Abhishek kumar said:
When system displaced by x then what is elongation in steel rod?

Since the displacement is very small ##x<<l##,
$$\frac {x} {\Delta l} \cong cos {\frac a 2}$$

So, $$\Delta l = x\cdot sec {\frac a 2}$$

Is it?
 
  • #11
VSayantan said:
Since the displacement is very small ##x<<l##,
$$\frac {x} {\Delta l} \cong cos {\frac a 2}$$

So, $$\Delta l = x\cdot sec {\frac a 2}$$

Is it?
ΔL cannot be more than x. Try again.
 
  • Like
Likes VSayantan and Abhishek kumar
  • #12
haruspex said:
ΔL cannot be more than x. Try again.

Oh!

Untitled3.png


$$\frac {\Delta l} {x}= cos \frac a 2$$
$$\Rightarrow \Delta l = x \cdot cos \frac a 2$$

Is it okey @haruspex ?

Now using this ##\Delta l## in the expression for Young's modulus, I obtain
$$Y= \frac {Tl} {A \Delta l}$$
$$\Rightarrow T= \frac {Y \pi r^2 x cos \frac a 2} {l}$$

Then I need to equate ##T## to ##m\vec a##?
 

Attachments

  • Untitled3.png
    Untitled3.png
    1.7 KB · Views: 1,351
  • #13
VSayantan said:
Oh!

View attachment 215379

$$\frac {\Delta l} {x}= cos \frac a 2$$
$$\Rightarrow \Delta l = x \cdot cos \frac a 2$$

Is it okey @haruspex ?

Now using this ##\Delta l## in the expression for Young's modulus, I obtain
$$Y= \frac {Tl} {A \Delta l}$$
$$\Rightarrow T= \frac {Y \pi r^2 x cos \frac a 2} {l}$$

Then I need to equate ##T## to ##m\vec a##?
Yes this is right
 
  • #14
Note that what you have computed is the difference in tension between the equilibrium point and the position ##x##, not the actual tension. The tension at the equilibrium point is just enough to cancel the gravitational force and need not be computed. It would be given directly by the geometry of the problem and the weight of the object.
 
  • Like
Likes VSayantan
  • #15
Orodruin said:
Note that what you have computed is the difference in tension between the equilibrium point and the position ##x##, not the actual tension. The tension at the equilibrium point is just enough to cancel the gravitational force and need not be computed. It would be given directly by the geometry of the problem and the weight of the object.
Yes this is the net restoring force that causes oscillation.
 
  • Like
Likes VSayantan
  • #16
Orodruin said:
Note that what you have computed is the difference in tension between the equilibrium point and the position ##x##, not the actual tension. The tension at the equilibrium point is just enough to cancel the gravitational force and need not be computed. It would be given directly by the geometry of the problem and the weight of the object.
So, $$m \frac {d^2x} {dt^2}=-\frac {Y \pi r^2 x cos \frac a 2} {l}$$
$$\Rightarrow \frac {d^2x} {dt^2}=-\frac {Y \pi r^2 x cos \frac a 2} {ml}$$

Which gives $$\omega = \sqrt {\frac {Y \pi r^2 cos \frac a 2} {ml}}$$
Then the time period is $$T=\frac {2\pi} {\sqrt {\frac {Y \pi r^2 cos \frac a 2} {ml}}}$$
$$i.e, ~T= 2\pi \cdot \sqrt {\frac {ml} {Y \pi r^2 cos \frac a 2}}$$

Is this right?
 
  • #17
[QUOTE="VSayantan, post: 5886885,

Is this right?[/QUOTE]
Not right.u have taken only force due to one rod into account and motion of mass in vertical direction so you should take component of T in vertical direction.
 
  • Like
Likes VSayantan
  • #18
Abhishek kumar said:
Not right.u have taken only force due to one rod into account and motion of mass in vertical direction so you should take component of T in vertical direction.

The total tension on the mass is ##2\cdot T \cdot cos \frac a 2##, rather the ##x##-component of tension, balanced by the weight ##mg## of the mass.
Then $$mg=2\cdot \frac {Y \pi r^2 x cos {\frac a 2}}{l}\cdot cos \frac a 2$$
Right?
So, how will I get the equation of motion?
 
  • #19
VSayantan said:
The total tension on the mass is ##2\cdot T \cdot cos \frac a 2##, rather the ##x##-component of tension, balanced by the weight ##mg## of the mass.
Then $$mg=2\cdot \frac {Y \pi r^2 x cos {\frac a 2}}{l}\cdot cos \frac a 2$$
Right?
So, how will I get the equation of motion?
If you take δl displacement where system is in equilibrium and equating mg with T. Now further displacement x cause oscillation. Write equation for Fnet
 
  • Like
Likes VSayantan
  • #20
Abhishek kumar said:
If you take δl displacement where system is in equilibrium and equating mg with T. Now further displacement x cause oscillation. Write equation for Fnet

I'm not sure I can follow your first sentence. ##T## is balanced by ##mg##, and not ##2T cos \frac a 2##?
So, you mean, ##T~+~\Delta T = F_{net}##?
$$i.e., ~mg~+~\frac {2Y\pi r^2 cos^2 {\frac a 2}}{l}=F_{net}$$

Is it?
 
  • #21
VSayantan said:
I'm not sure I can follow your first sentence. ##T## is balanced by ##mg##, and not ##2T cos \frac a 2##?
So, you mean, ##T~+~\Delta T = F_{net}##?
$$i.e., ~mg~+~\frac {2Y\pi r^2 cos^2 {\frac a 2}}{l}=F_{net}$$

Is it?
2Y*pi*r^2*$l*cos^2(a/2)/l=mg
Now further displacement of x gives
-(2Y*pi*r^2*($l+x)*cos^2(a/2)/l-mg)=ma
Now you can put value of mg and get the result
 
  • Like
Likes VSayantan
  • #22
Abhishek kumar said:
2Y*pi*r^2*$l*cos^2(a/2)/l=mg
Now further displacement of x gives
-(2Y*pi*r^2*($l+x)*cos^2(a/2)/l-mg)=ma
Now you can put value of mg and get the result

So, there are actually two equations!
$$2\cdot T \cdot \Delta l \cdot cos \frac a 2= mg$$
and
$$m \frac {d^2x}{dt^2} = -[2\cdot T \cdot (\Delta l + x) \cdot cos \frac a 2 - mg]$$
$$\Rightarrow \frac {d^2x}{dt^2} = - \frac {2\cdot T \cdot x \cdot cos \frac a 2}{m}$$
$$\Rightarrow \frac {d^2x}{dt^2} = - \frac {2Y \pi r^2 cos^2 \frac a 2}{ml}x$$

Hence, $$\omega =\sqrt {\frac {2Y \pi r^2 cos^2 \frac a 2}{ml}}$$
So, time period $$T={\frac {2\pi}{r}} \sqrt {\frac {ml} {2Y \pi cos^2 \frac a 2}}$$

But the thing is there should be no ##\pi## in the denominator of the expression for time period.
 
  • #23
VSayantan said:
So, there are actually two equations!
$$2\cdot T \cdot \Delta l \cdot cos \frac a 2= mg$$
and
$$m \frac {d^2x}{dt^2} = -[2\cdot T \cdot (\Delta l + x) \cdot cos \frac a 2 - mg]$$
$$\Rightarrow \frac {d^2x}{dt^2} = - \frac {2\cdot T \cdot x \cdot cos \frac a 2}{m}$$
$$\Rightarrow \frac {d^2x}{dt^2} = - \frac {2Y \pi r^2 cos^2 \frac a 2}{ml}x$$

Hence, $$\omega =\sqrt {\frac {2Y \pi r^2 cos^2 \frac a 2}{ml}}$$
So, time period $$T={\frac {2\pi}{r}} \sqrt {\frac {ml} {2Y \pi cos^2 \frac a 2}}$$

But the thing is there should be no ##\pi## in the denominator of the expression for time period.
Why not is there any reason behind that
 
  • Like
Likes VSayantan
  • #24
Abhishek kumar said:
Why not is there any reason behind that

Not really.
I've opted for it as the closest answer, though.

Anyway, thanks for your time @Abhishek kumar .
 
  • #25
VSayantan said:
Not really.
I've opted for it as the closest answer, though.
Are you saying that the official answer is the same as yours but without the √π in the denominator?
That must be there since it comes from the cross-sectional area of the wire.
 
  • Like
Likes VSayantan
  • #26
haruspex said:
Are you saying that the official answer is the same as yours but without the √π in the denominator?
That must be there since it comes from the cross-sectional area of the wire.

There are four choices given -
##1. {\frac {2\pi}{r}} \sqrt {\frac {ml} {2\cdot Y \cdot cos^2 {\frac a 2}}}##

##2. 2\pi {\sqrt {\frac {l \cdot cos {\frac a 2}}{g}}}##

##3. \sqrt {\frac {2\pi m l}{Yr^2}}##

##4. {\frac {2\pi} {r}}{\sqrt {\frac {m \cdot g \cdot l} {2Y}}}##
 
  • #27
VSayantan said:
There are four choices given -
##1. {\frac {2\pi}{r}} \sqrt {\frac {ml} {2\cdot Y \cdot cos^2 {\frac a 2}}}##

##2. 2\pi {\sqrt {\frac {l \cdot cos {\frac a 2}}{g}}}##

##3. \sqrt {\frac {2\pi m l}{Yr^2}}##

##4. {\frac {2\pi} {r}}{\sqrt {\frac {m \cdot g \cdot l} {2Y}}}##
You can eliminate all options except (1) by considering how they depend on the variables. g cannot be relevant, the angle a must be, with the period tending to infinity as the angle tends to π, etc.
And as I posted, there must be a π in the frequency because of the dependence on the cross sectional area of the wire, so your answer must be correct.
 
  • Like
Likes VSayantan

What is the time period of a small oscillation?

The time period of a small oscillation is the amount of time it takes for a system to complete one full cycle of oscillation. This can be calculated by dividing the total time of one cycle by the number of cycles.

How is the time period of a small oscillation measured?

The time period of a small oscillation can be measured using a stopwatch or timer, by counting the number of oscillations in a given amount of time. It can also be calculated using mathematical equations for specific systems.

What factors affect the time period of a small oscillation?

The time period of a small oscillation can be affected by several factors including the mass of the object, the force applied to the object, and the stiffness of the system. Generally, a larger mass and a stronger force result in a longer time period, while a stiffer system results in a shorter time period.

How does the time period of a small oscillation relate to the frequency of oscillation?

The time period of a small oscillation and the frequency of oscillation are inversely related. This means that as the time period increases, the frequency decreases, and vice versa. This relationship can be represented by the equation T = 1/f, where T is the time period and f is the frequency.

Can the time period of a small oscillation be changed?

Yes, the time period of a small oscillation can be changed by altering the factors that affect it, such as the mass, force, or stiffness of the system. For example, increasing the mass or stiffness of the system will result in a longer time period, while increasing the force will result in a shorter time period.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
473
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
265
Replies
31
Views
670
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
20
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
926
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
572
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
24
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
705
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
13
Views
1K
Back
Top