Top heavier than Higgs. Why not found at Fermilab?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nrqed
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fermilab Higgs
nrqed
Science Advisor
Messages
3,762
Reaction score
297
The title says it all. The top is heavier than the Higgs boson. In that case, why was the LHC needed to find the Higgs conclusively? (a related question is: how strong was the evidence for the Higgs from the Tevatron?) Is the answer simply a question of higher luminosity at the LHC?? Or is the fact of working at higher energy at the LHC leads to much higher cross sections for Higgs production?


Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
See that thread for an earlier discussion.

Top-quarks have a very clear decay signature and a large production cross-section.

how strong was the evidence for the Higgs from the Tevatron?
I think the last update had something like 2.5-3 standard deviations.

Is the answer simply a question of higher luminosity at the LHC?? Or is the fact of working at higher energy at the LHC leads to much higher cross sections for Higgs production?
Higher luminosity and higher energy are both important. And the detectors are better.
 
mfb said:
See that thread for an earlier discussion.

Top-quarks have a very clear decay signature and a large production cross-section.


I think the last update had something like 2.5-3 standard deviations.


Higher luminosity and higher energy are both important. And the detectors are better.

Thank you for your reply and for your posts in the other thread. Very illuminating.

I see that the fact that much fewer clean channels in the Higgs case makes a higher luminosity critical. I would like to understand better the role of the energy. Having a higher center of mass energy increases the production rates, certainly. Are the production rates very sensitive to the energy? I mean, does going from 2 TeV to 7 TeV make a big difference in the number of events or is it a very small factor compared to the luminosity role?

Thank you for your expertise.

Patrick
 
For the top-quark, the the higher energy at the LHC increased the cross-section (and therefore the particles per integrated luminosity) by a factor of 20-30.
Higgs: ~1pb at the tevatron, ~15pb at the LHC (7 TeV) according to this article.
Energy is really important for heavy particles.
 
Let's use the other thread, please.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Back
Top