What Torque is Needed to Rotate a Solid Bored Ball?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the torque needed to rotate a solid bored ball, the moment of inertia must first be determined using the formula I=1/2 m (r_i^2 + r_0^2), where r_i and r_0 are the inner and outer radial distances. The relationship between torque (T), moment of inertia (I), and angular acceleration (α) is expressed as T=Iα. There is uncertainty regarding whether to include the caps at the top and bottom of the ball in the moment of inertia calculation. If included, the moment of inertia of these caps must be calculated and added to that of the hollow cylinder. Understanding and applying these equations is essential for accurate torque calculation.
sushilshinge
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I want to calculate the torque required to rotate a ball.
1. Ball is solid having mass M kg.
2. Ball is bored through about its axis.
3. Ball is rotating about the axis XX

Please see attached file.
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You must find the moment of inertia of a hollow cylinder which is,
I=1/2 m ( r_i^2 + r_0^2)
r_i and the r_0 are radial distances from centre.

Than the relationship between torque, moment of intertia and angular acceleration, which is,
T=I \alpha

Now looking at the picture I am not sure if ur including those caps on the top and bottom. In which case you must find their moment of intertia and add it to the cylinder
 
Right side view is a section of a ball. The hatching part is a solid part of ball.When you will cut the ball in left view in middle then by looking left side it will look like in right view.
 
Not sure I completely understand what your saying. Are the equations what you are after? Just find the moment of inertia of the top and bottom parts, if indeed I am understanding you correctly
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top