Torques on a Rod - Need Quick Help

  • Thread starter Thread starter physicsguy101
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rod Torques
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on analyzing the forces and torques acting on a rod. It highlights that while the rod may be in horizontal translational equilibrium, it is not in vertical equilibrium due to a greater downward force. The moments about the center of the rod need to be computed to determine if they sum to zero. The only torque acting on the rod is a counterclockwise torque from the vertical component of a force, which is perpendicular to the radius. Understanding these dynamics is essential for solving the problem effectively.
physicsguy101
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
2labtqs.png



If anyone can give me some quick help on this, I would appreciate it.

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
physicsguy101 said:
2labtqs.png
If anyone can give me some quick help on this, I would appreciate it.

Thanks in advance.

I can't quite tell, but it looks like it's possible that the vertical and horizontal components of force could each sum to zero. But what about the moments? Try computing the sum of the moments about the center of the rod. Is it zero?

BBB
 
Well, looking at the horizontal axis only we can assume from the picture that the rod is in translational equilibrium (it doesn't move) along the horizontal axis. But looking in the vertical axis, we see a greater force downwards than the vertical component of F(3), so the rod is actually moving downwards (it's not in vertical translational equilibrium). Even if we assume that the rod is in translational equilibrium both in horizontal and vertical axes due to diagram error, if you call your pivot point the point where F(2) is acting upon, the only torque applied is a counterclockwise torque by the vertical component of F(3), which is perpendicular to a radius extending from the rod = actual torque.

I hope that helps!
 
Thanks guys! I appreciate the help!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top