Trailer being pulled, where to put origin re: torque?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a trailer being pulled by a truck, focusing on the forces and torques acting on the system. The original poster seeks to determine the vertical component of the pulling force and how to appropriately set the origin for torque calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the placement of the origin for torque calculations, considering various points such as the center of the wheel and the point where the pulling force acts. There are questions about how to include different forces in the torque equations and the implications of choosing different origins.

Discussion Status

Some participants have suggested calculating torque relative to the point of application of the pulling force, while others have raised concerns about including the normal force and the center of mass in their calculations. There is an ongoing exploration of the relationships between the forces involved, with no clear consensus yet on the best approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity of the problem due to the multiple forces and the need to consider both vertical and horizontal components of the forces acting on the trailer. There are references to specific distances and components that are critical for setting up the torque equations.

lizzyb
Messages
167
Reaction score
0
Hi. This question is mostly done by a figure; we have a loaded truck of weight W being pulled by a truck with a force F. The CM point on the figure ndicates the location of the center of mass of the trailer and its load.

Suppose the trailer accelerates forward (a>0) or backwards (a<0). What is the vertical component F_y of the force F on the trailer?

For the forces in the X and Y I have:
[tex]\sum F_x = ma[/tex] (since there is some acceleration)
[tex]\sum F_y = n + F_y - W = 0[/tex]

Now, I suppose, I'm to write an equation for the torque, but this one isn't that easy - where do i put the origin? thank you.
 

Attachments

  • 10-homework-image-01.png
    10-homework-image-01.png
    1.2 KB · Views: 457
Physics news on Phys.org
It's usually a good idea when you have an unknown force to calculate torque relative to the point of application of that force (maybe other places too, but at least at that point). This problem does not involve any driving force at the wheel, so the only force at the wheel is normal to the ground as shown in the diagram.

Edit: This was the wrong approach for this problem. See the later posts.
 
Last edited:
do you mean put the origin at the center of the wheel? or do you mean put the origin right where the F vector (the one pulling the cart) is pointing off into space?

if i put the origin at the center of the wheel, aren't i supposed to go through the center of mass and if so, how can i include the force vector?

if i put the origin where the F vector goes off into space, how can I include the normal force?

thanks!
 
I mean put the origin where F is acting. You know the direction and the distances from this point for the other forces acting (n and W). This will tell you the relationship between n and W. You already have the equation that relates n, W and F_y.

Edit: This was the wrong approach for this problem. See the later posts.
 
Last edited:
OlderDan said:
I mean put the origin where F is acting. You know the direction and the distances from this point for the other forces acting (n and W). This will tell you the relationship between n and W. You already have the equation that relates n, W and F_y.

so it would be:
[tex]\sum \tau = w(L - d) - n L = 0[/tex]

So,
[tex]F_y = w - n = w - \frac{w(L - d)}{L} = \frac{L w - w(L - d)}{L} = \frac{w(L - L + d)}{L} = \frac{wd}{L}[/tex]

hmm, the answers to choose from are things like [tex]F_y = \frac{W}{2L}(d - \frac{ah}{g})[/tex]
:frown:
 
do i need to have the 'bar' of which to calculate the torque go through the center of mass? as in, from F, draw diagonally toward the top-left of the cart? or can I just draw it straight across?
 
how did they put 'a' in the equation for F_y? In all the answer's I can choose from, 'a' (acceleration) is in all of them.hmmm
 
lizzyb said:
so it would be:
[tex]\sum \tau = w(L - d) - n L = 0[/tex]

So,
[tex]F_y = w - n = w - \frac{w(L - d)}{L} = \frac{L w - w(L - d)}{L} = \frac{w(L - L + d)}{L} = \frac{wd}{L}[/tex]

hmm, the answers to choose from are things like [tex]F_y = \frac{W}{2L}(d - \frac{ah}{g})[/tex]
:frown:
I took a wrong turn earlier. You need to calculate the torque about the center of mass and set that to zero. The F has two components. The horizontal component is the only thing that will accelerate the trailer, and the distance from the line of that force component to the CM is given. This force is F_x = ma = a*W/g. The y component of the hitch force (the one you are looking for) also has a known distance, and the normal force has a known distance. You can set up an equation that can be solved for N in terms of the other things from this torque. Then use the other equation for N from the sum of the vertical forces being zero. Set those two expression for N equal and solve for F_y
 
Last edited:
  • #10
when i calculate the torque, do i use a horizontal 'beam' thing?

[tex]\sum \tau = nd ...[/tex]

since F goes up to the right I'm not sure how to include it.

edited:
[tex]\sum \tau = -nd + F(L - d) = 0[/tex]
??
 
Last edited:
  • #11
lizzyb said:
when i calculate the torque, do i use a horizontal 'beam' thing?

[tex]\sum \tau = nd ...[/tex]

since F goes up to the right I'm not sure how to include it.

edited:
[tex]\sum \tau = -nd + F(L - d) = 0[/tex]
??
(L - d) is the correct distance for the vertical component of F. The horizontal component is a perpendicular distance of h from the CM and don't forget the horizontal component is the only force accelerating the trailer.
 
  • #12
this?
[tex]\sum \tau = F_y(L - d) - F_x h - nd = 0[/tex]
[tex]\sum F_x = ma = a \frac{W}{g}[/tex]
[tex]\sum F_y = n + F_y - W = 0[/tex]
??
 
  • #13
ok great! for some reason my sign was different than the answers provided but mine was close enough that i tried it. thanks a lot Dan! this question has two more parts but hopefully with this equation i should be able to figure it out! :-)
 
  • #14
i did it! thanks everyone! i finished my physics homework - 3 hours to spare (and class in 7 hours :-O {but it's chemistry}). you're an answer to my prayers! yay ! i understand it better, too - i now realize that we're to take the torque around a POINT - not a bar. :-)! good night! thanks again!
 
  • #15
lizzyb said:
this?
[tex]\sum \tau = F_y(L - d) - F_x h - nd = 0[/tex]
[tex]\sum F_x = ma = a \frac{W}{g}[/tex]
[tex]\sum F_y = n + F_y - W = 0[/tex]
??
I think your sign problem is here. The two torques from F are both counterclockwise.

[tex]\sum \tau = F_y(L - d) + F_x h - nd = 0[/tex]
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
10K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
11K