Transformers: Uniform magnetic filed in relation to current flow

AI Thread Summary
In a transformer lab scenario, the discussion centers on the behavior of current in a wire loop when a uniform magnetic field is suddenly turned off. The key concept is that induced currents arise from changes in magnetic flux, as described by Faraday's Law and Lenz's Law. When the magnetic field collapses to zero, the change in flux occurs in the opposite direction of the original field, which induces a current in the loop. Understanding the direction of this change is crucial; it is not about the current being zero, but rather the opposing flux that generates the induced current. The conversation emphasizes the importance of recognizing the dynamics of changing fields rather than static conditions.
dba
Messages
29
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In our lab about transformers we have a question as follows:
Consider a loop in a uniform magnetic field. If the field is suddenly turned off, in which direction will the current flow in the wire?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


My first thought was that if there is no current then there is no magnetic field but I am not sure. Thanks for any hint.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Currents are induced by the loop experiencing changes in the magnetic field, and in particular, changes in the magnetic flux within the area circumscribed by the loop.

Look up Faraday's law and Lenz's Law.

You will have to determine the direction of the change in flux that takes place when the field is switched off, and then determine the resulting direction of the induced current.
 
Can you explain a little better what you mean by the direction of the change in the flux? For the problem, there are no numbers. There is a vertical loop and the direction of the field is to the right. The flux is the integral of B*A since B and da are parallel and A is pi*r^2. Thanks!.
 
The flux is the integral of B*da, and in this case since B starts out at some constant value, and since A is also constant, the flux is B*A.

If you were to represent the original flux as a vector pointing through the loop plane, it would be pointing in the direction of the magnetic field B (to the right, since that's the direction that you said that B points). What happens when the whatever is supplying B field is switched off? The B field collapses to zero, right? What then will be the direction of the change in flux?
 
That is exactly what I do not understand. I do not know how to imagine a direction of a change. As I mentioned in the beginning, I would assume if my B goes to zero, then the flus will be zero and the current will be zero. therefore there would't be a direction.
 
dba said:
That is exactly what I do not understand. I do not know how to imagine a direction of a change. As I mentioned in the beginning, I would assume if my B goes to zero, then the flus will be zero and the current will be zero. therefore there would't be a direction.

Often the interesting stuff happens while things are changing, not after they've changed :smile:

Before the field's disappearance the flux is B*A and is comprised of magnetic field lines of B, which have a definite orientation while passing through the plane of the loop. So when the field collapses, it's as though you're adding a counter-flux to oppose and cancel the flux of the B field. That is to say, the flux change is in the direction opposite that of B. The magnitude of that flux change is B*A if the field goes to zero.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top