Transition energy estimation based on bond length

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a discrepancy in energy estimation results using the particle in a box model, specifically with initial and final quantum numbers n(Initial) = 22 and n(End) = 23, leading to a calculated box length of 732 pm and an energy result of 39.3 nm, which differs significantly from the textbook answer of 239 nm. Participants emphasize the importance of showing work for effective assistance, highlighting that incomplete submissions hinder the ability of volunteers to help. There is also a suggestion to improve the clarity of the submitted image for better understanding. The conversation underscores the need for clear communication and presentation in problem-solving discussions. Overall, accurate calculations and proper formatting are crucial for collaborative learning in such forums.
hanhjung99
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Moved from another forum. No template.
I come across this question in a textbook. Somehow my result is way off from the solution answer. I used the energy formula for particle in a box with n(Initial) = 22 and n(End) = 23, the calculated box length is 732 pm. I arrived at an answer of 39.3 nm. The answer from the answer book is but 239 nm. Thanks for the help
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2018-12-23 at 11.04.33.png
    Screenshot 2018-12-23 at 11.04.33.png
    16.4 KB · Views: 382
Physics news on Phys.org
:welcome:

Our rules say that you must show us your work, not just your answer, before our helpers give help.
 
  • Like
Likes hanhjung99
anorlunda said:
:welcome:

Our rules say that you must show us your work, not just your answer, before our helpers give help.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2767.jpg
    IMG_2767.jpg
    22.7 KB · Views: 335
You're making it hard for would be helpers. Can you rotate that image 90 degrees, crop,it and enhance the contrast?

We are volunteers here. If a helper thinks your post is difficult, he/she can just skip,it.
 
Edited image
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2767.jpg
    IMG_2767.jpg
    53.5 KB · Views: 315
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top