Translating cylinder in viscous fluid

MichielM
Messages
22
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I have a cylinder of radius R translating (in radial direction) with velocity U in a viscous fluid at Re<<1. Find the force exerted on the cylinder per unit length

Homework Equations


Re<<1 so the Navier-Stokes equation simplifies to the Stokes equation:
\nabla P=\mu \nabla^2 v
The cylinder makes use of polar coordinates useful so the stream function for this problem is defined as:
\frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial \Psi}{\partial \theta}=u_r
-\frac{\partial \Psi}{\partial r}=u_{\theta}

The Attempt at a Solution


Given the problem statement and the choice for polar coordinates, the boundary conditions become:
u_r(R)=U \cos\theta
u_{\theta}(R)=-U \sin\theta
u_r(\infty)=u_{\theta}(\infty)=0

With help of the continuity equation the Stokes equation can be turned into:
\nabla^4 \Psi=0
And taking \Psi=\sin \theta f(r) the equation further 'simplifies' to:
\left[\frac{\partial^2}{\partial r^2}+\frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial}{\partial r}-\frac{1}{r^2}\right]^2f(r)=0

A general solution to this equation is f(r)=A r^3+Br \ln r + C r+\frac{D}{r}

Using the definition of the stream function it follows that:
u_r=\frac{f(r)}{r}\cos \theta and u_{\theta}=-\sin\theta \frac{\partial f(r)}{\partial r}.

The boundary conditions for f(r) then become:
f(R)=U R
\frac{\partial f(R)}{\partial r}=U
\frac{f(\infty)}{\infty}\cos \theta=0
-\sin \theta \frac{\partial f(\infty)}{\partial r}=0

The two infinity conditions yield A=B=C=0 and for the other two I find:

\frac{D}{R}=U R and \frac{-D}{R^2}=U

And that is where I get stuck, because I will not be able to satisfy these conditions, so what did I do wrong?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
mmm, seems like I found the famous Stokes' paradox. For other people reading this and wondering how to solve it: take a look at Oseen's approximation method
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top