Translational and rotational kinetic energy-Mass Unknown

AI Thread Summary
A hollow, thin-walled sphere with a mass of 20 kg rolls down a 30° incline, covering 20 m in 3.6 seconds, prompting the need to determine the mass of an unknown liquid inside. The discussion emphasizes the importance of translational and rotational kinetic energy, noting that the center of mass velocity is independent of mass and radius. Participants suggest calculating acceleration and treating the liquid as non-rotating while considering the moment of inertia provided. There is a debate on whether to differentiate between the thin-walled sphere and a solid sphere filled with liquid. The focus remains on using the given parameters to solve for the liquid's mass effectively.
Crusader711
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
A hollow, thin-walled sphere (ICM = 2MR2/3) of mass 20 kg is completely filled with a liquid of unknown mass. The sphere is released at the top of a plane inclined at 30° to the horizontal, and it rolls 20 m to the bottom in 3.6 s. What is the mass of the liquid?



2.My approach is translational and rotational kinetic energy, first off. I know that for rolling spheres the v-cm is not dependent upon the mass nor radius of the objects. So I come up with a translational speed but I'm not certain where to go from there. But the problem wants the mass of the liquid. I have two different sphere's in theory, a solid and a thin-walled version.



3. Looking for a lead into the next step...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Crusader711! :smile:
Crusader711 said:
I know that for rolling spheres the v-cm is not dependent upon the mass nor radius of the objects.

for a particular shape, yes
I have two different sphere's in theory, a solid and a thin-walled version.

But you're given the moment of inertia anyway.

Since we're not told the radius of the sphere, I think we're supposed to assume that the liquid does not rotate.

So find the acceleration, call the mass of the liquid "m", and carry on from there. :smile:
 
Rolling verses Frictionless

Would we treat the spheres differently?

thin-walled sphere rolling...

...then solid sphere with liquid, liquid sphere moving down incline (not rolling), but we have to account for the ICM of the thin-walled shell too?

Any thoughts?
 
(just got up :zzz:)

i assume "ICM" means moment of inertia?

you are given the moment of inertia and the mass, why do you need to know anything else?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top