Troubleshooting a Piezo Lighter: An Unreliable Task

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on troubleshooting a piezo lighter connected to a rheostat and various resistors, with an oscilloscope providing erratic voltage readings. Users suggest that the erratic output may be characteristic of piezo devices, and recommend using a single-shot digital oscilloscope for accurate measurement of voltage events. They emphasize the importance of confirming the linearity of the transfer characteristic before concluding that the issue lies with the mechanical striker's reliability. Additionally, caution is advised against connecting the piezo lighter directly to an oscilloscope due to high voltage risks, recommending the use of a high voltage probe instead. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities of measuring piezoelectric outputs and the need for appropriate equipment.
wushumaster
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
So I have the piezo lighter hooked up to a rheostat with one mega ohm resistance, then a 30 kilo ohm resistor and then another resistor of 1 mega ohm. I have an oscilloscope- it's really old though. It's max voltage if you set the axis on the bottom of the screen is about 80 Volts. It's hard to discern the erratic and unreliable peaks I'm getting, and I'm not even sure their right? The other way I tried was to just see how far I could hold the wires apart and see a spark shoot through one to other and apparently around 33 kilo ohms per cm is accurate. But I keep getting varying results here too. It ranges from 1 to 2 cm... I even tried hooking the lighter to a 2-1 transformer to see if I put wires from the transformer half way apart than without the transformers, I would have been able to see a spark, but I did not.
Ideas, anything, any help- would all me most wonderful. I'm pretty stuck and I need a quantitative reading...
Thanks so much!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org


The output of a piezo element probably really looks as erratic as you are seeing. Strictly the way to be sure (but you may not have the equipment) is to use a single-shot digital scope instead. Then you can capture a single event entirely and then compare success events.

Also if you were measuring with laboratory equipment, you'd first do a slow voltage/mechanic force ramp to measure the transfer characteristic in displacement/voltage. A typical piezo device's the transfer function is pretty much linear up to high compression and voltages.

This is also how you should measure dielectric breakdown. In semiconductors you typically get breakdown voltage using a "Vramp" test - basically does a ramp at varying rates until a breakdown criteria is met. There's a JEDEC 35 standard that probably could be applied to a piezo dielectric breakdown. If you are doing this commercially, my company sells measurement systems for this kind of test.

Once you confirm the transfer characteristic is linear (which is likely), then you know for certain the problem is mechanical - probably the striker is squirrelly and unreliable in the force or displacement it's applying.

Mechanical features are always the reliability demon of electromechanical parts.
 


Is there any way your company can loan one to me or rent it out somewhere in the Denver Metro area for perhaps one time use? I'm in high school and I'm doing a science fair project. It would be extremely valuable- thank you for your help!
 


An airgap will arc if the voltage across the gap exceeds 30000 volts per centimeter of gap.

So, it sounds like you have about 50000 volts.

So, whatever else you do, do not connect this to an oscilloscope. There is a switch in there with some very hard-to-replace resistors and you don't need to damage these with high voltages.
And if that voltage gets to the vertical amplifier, you will have some serious problems.

You really need a high voltage probe for this. It would have to drop 50000 volts down to about 50 volts so that you can observe the waveform.

These are expensive but you may find something on Ebay.
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...

Similar threads

Back
Top