Troubleshooting a Wrong Answer with Coulomb's Law

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around troubleshooting a calculation error using Coulomb's Law. The original poster calculated the radial distance and attempted to sum forces but ended up with a net force of zero due to neglecting the vector nature of forces. Participants emphasized the importance of considering direction when applying Coulomb's Law, suggesting the use of unit vectors to accurately represent forces. They also pointed out a miscalculation in the application of the Pythagorean theorem. Properly accounting for vector directions is crucial for obtaining the correct net force in this scenario.
sophzilla
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Hello -

I worked out this problem but I got a wrong answer.

16m0wgi.jpg


First, I used the Pythagorean theorem to find the radial distance between A and each charges. So 1.2m divided by 2 (= 0.6), then the square root of .6 squared + .6 squared = .849, which is the radius.

Then I used Coulomb's Law to calculate the net force:

kqAq1/R2 + kqAq2/R2 + ... and so forth.

I took out the kqA/R2, which is the same for all, and came up with:

kqA/R2 (q1 + q2 + q3 + q4).

But it so happens that the numbers inside the parenthesis turns out to be 0.

What did I do wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you're forgetting the vector nature of force. Simply adding up the numbers won't do any good. You have to add them vectorially.
 
First your pythagorean theorem is a bit off. it should be:

a^2=b^2+c^2

EDIT: You got it right I misinterpreted what you had done originally.

Then you have neglected to take any directions when working out the force so try setting up a reference freame and adding the directions into your equation.
 
Hello sophzilla,

I think you don't take into account that the forces are vectors.

You can start applying Coulomb's law for one diagonal at a time. For instance Q_4, q, Q_2. Do you agree that the 2 forces will add up to a net force pointing from q towards Q_2?

Regards,

nazzard
 
16m7uk6.jpg


I would appreciate any help. Thanks.
 
Those are not vectors. That is why it is not working. Consider the unit vectors i and j and how they would add up to pointin the directions you require to the charges from the centre. The magnitudes are then as you have calculated.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top